Oldandtired
2d
Compare and contrast the public statements of Trumps ceaseless admiration for Putin to Clinton’s condemnation of him.
Or the Trump campaign giving Russia polling data or the Trump Tower meeting or asking Russia to divulge Hilarys emails a US government official.
The crazy part is that 2 of the worlds most dangerous dictators continue to receive Trumps unexplainable praise as both are a threat to the US and the world at large.
Patriotism at its finest huh i even seem to recall the maga t-shirts saying I’d prefer Russians over democrats or something stupid like that.
Guess though everything is the same as everything else nowadays.
All about trump. No one word about the biden crimes.
I can point out all the rest which were all but trump replies. Not one post about the biden crime family in a biden thread.
Here is the fault in the bolded part…he doesn’t have to prove his innocence, the state has to prove guilt.
Hence the phrase “Presumed innocent until convicted”
I’m sorry to all three of you but I’m not understanding the gotcha here.
I didn’t assign any guilt to either men but reiterated the need for it to be proven in court.
I was otherwise talking about some Trump supporters who don’t have faith in the legal system to adjudicate the matter.
I was also referring to people who have assigned innocence to Trump without hearing any evidence.
The same standard should apply to Biden.
It is quite simple and clearly stated in my post.
ANYONE accused of a crime does not “have to prove his innocence” in this country, the state has to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Just because the cash isn’t in his pocket does not mean Sloppy Joe wasn’t bribed. Based on a law that Biden signed in 2011.
Schweizer said, “Yeah well, what we know is that Joe Biden has an LLC called CelticCapri through which he runs his money, and on his 2017 and 2018 tax returns, he said on his tax returns that he had $12.6 million in income during those two years. Flash forward to 2019 when he runs for president of the United States, he fills out a form from the Office of Government Ethics, a financial disclosure. During those same two years, he says on form that he only had $7.4 million in income. That’s 40% less than he told the IRS that that he had. What accounts for that $5.2 million discrepancy? It’s during the same time period, it’s the same entity. I certainly think one possibility is in 2019 when he fills out that form to run for president, there’s a lot more scrutiny than there was when he was filing his taxes back in 2018.”
He added, “One of the reasons the House is investigating is to untangle how Joe Biden might have financially benefited from these deals. But let’s be crystal clear about this, if you look at the federal guidelines on bribery, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the international bribery standards that the Obama-Biden administration signed on to in 2011, bribery does not just entail the politician getting paid. If he was a political figure and took actions that benefited an entity that then pays your family members and you don’t even get a dime that still constitutes bribery.”
Which form is true? Aren’t we being told that people who signed a form saying they were electors when they hadn’t been approved were lying on a form and should go to jail?
It’s called remembering history. It’s seems like that is not a thing on the left. That way the left can support never ending wars even after years of pretending to hate them. No history, no problem becoming a neocon after a decade of hating them.
The Obama years all over again! One day he’s Emperor Palpatine, the next day he’s Jar-Jar Binks.
