They don’t care. It could be 2 made up folks but if they are said to critisize Trump that’s good enough!
Read the Report. It’s in there. #factsmatter
No it’s not.No collusion and not enough proof of any obstruction to do anything with.
If it was made up wouldn’t someone within the DOJ call it out as such?
It’s like when your president says, “People are saying…” except people familiar with the matter actually exist.
1 Like
We will find out how credible this story is when Horowitz’s report comes out.
Shouldn’t be too much longer now.
No, because the entire DOJ staff is working overtime on coming up with a new rationale for the citizenship question on the census… except for the attorneys who lost that case at every court level… who are reportedly on a multi-day pub crawl in Alexandria.
2 Likes
You’ve made progress. It’s no longer, “no collusion, no obstruction” but just “no collusion.” Doubt has entered the equation.
2 Likes
OK this part is funny.
Steele’s defenders have noted that the information he provided which made it into the FISA warrant application to monitor Page was not far off. According to Steele’s sources,
Information provided was not that far off according to Steele’s source.
Oh ■■■■ me…what is this world coming too.
No it doesn’t. It means two people have an opinion.
We know one of them was from Steele’s source. 
That is interesting
Well there’s one of the “sources”.
you don’t even know who they are.
Horrowitz will write another report like his last one, bias throughout the department but bias never effected their decisions.
So mueller was tasked with investigating “russian collusion”, found some, and decided not to charge anyone with it.
Interesting kook theory. Tell us more.
Do you know what was in the FISA submission? How did you get that information?
We’ve had a year or more of made-up stories about the FISA court…most importantly their decisions to renew the surveillance on Carter Paige. Their procedure is that any renewal is based on the quality of the intelligence provided by the initial surveillance. It seems extremely unlikely that the court would have used the initial application by itself to support a renewal… unless you want to argue that the FISA judges are themselves corrupt. As they’ve been appointed by both R & D Presidents that’s a fairly far-fetched allegation.
Wait for it.
The dude brought down fifa…of course he has cred. Told you so…but noooo what do I know…
Since there is no federal crime of “collusion” tell us how it is possible indict someone for it? Collusion was always the word promoted by Trump and Co. because it was a behavior that could not lead to an indictment.
