Gaslighting because trolling
enki
February 13, 2020, 11:32pm
82
Yes
Yes. Do you know why he wasnât charged?
Yes. Do you know why he wasnât charged?
JayJay
February 13, 2020, 11:32pm
83
conan:
Sure they doâŚ
So you think the Trump-appointed attorneys who recommended the initial sentence for Stone have been corrupted by the Deep State underlings beneath him?
conan
February 13, 2020, 11:32pm
84
Thank youâŚonly one that answered me.
Now what was done about it?
Bar canât do what job if Trump tweets?
Ignore sentencing guidelines that apply to everyone but Trumpâs friends?
1 Like
conan
February 13, 2020, 11:34pm
86
If he came through the system yes. You donât get promoted unless you have the right attitude/philosophy.
JayJay
February 13, 2020, 11:35pm
87
Watching Barr now.
He is totally lying when he said he didnât talk to the President before overriding his prosecutors.
2 Likes
JayJay
February 13, 2020, 11:35pm
88
YepâŚitâs never Trump.
Theyâre all Deep Staters.
The poor guyâŚ
conan
February 13, 2020, 11:35pm
89
ReallyâŚdo you have lie detector test hooked up to him?
Ever notice how Trump canât ever saying anything to peopleâs faces. Just tweets at 3am.
1 Like
JayJay
February 13, 2020, 11:36pm
91
Yep.
I did as a matter of fact.
Lol he doesnât even fire people. He tells people everything so fine and then tweets when they leave or tells someone else to do it.
1 Like
Around 10,000 cases in Federal Court just in the last year. How many sentencing recommendations were overruled by the AG? One? Only one you say? And it happens to be the Presidents longest serving ally, compatriot, friend, and arguably the pivotal person who convinced Trump to seek election as a Republican in 2016? Huh. Iâm sure itâs just a coincidence.
1 Like
conan
February 13, 2020, 11:36pm
94
Good thing I have my boots on.
No way Trump is gonna stand for anyone telling him not to do anything even if it leads to mass resignations at Justice.
NebraskaFootball:
Youâre conflating two distinctly different things.
Trump is the head of the Executive Branch, including the DOJ, and has been for years now. Itâs his people. They work at his pleasure. And he has the authority to request they do what he seeks, as long as there is no corrupt intent. If crimes were committed by Clapper or McCabe, then it is Trumpâs prerogative to demand his DOJ act. Something he has failed to do and is the source of your alleged vitriol. Of which I actually doubt.
Then there is the issue of Stone. Someone who has gone through the full process and had his crimes adjudicated. He was found guilty by a jury of his peers. Sentencing guidelines and recommendations are established and were submitted. Trump and/or his AG acting on his behalf to undercut a fully adjudicated conviction, in order to show leniency to one of his friends, reeks of corrupt intent, and deserves to be scrutinized.
I have to assume you are quite capable of seeing the difference here and are no longer going to falsely try to conflate the two scenarios.
Which leads us back to whom your ire should be directed. All of the crimes you believe to have occurred have been prevented from progressing by the Trump administration. No one else. The man you fully support is the head of this all. Itâs because of him that you feel as if there is a two-tier justice system.
So, with how upset you are at this travesty, will you continue to support him and defend him? Or will you show us all once and for all what many of us already believe to be the case?
@conan
Donât be scared to reply to this. Please. I think this is important.
He needs stone for the 2020 election so he can steal it.
The point (again) is that Trump already fired the Obama US Attorneyâs. Any that are still there were appointed by TRUMP.
And to repeat:
Point #2 You said âStarting with clearing everyone out that was hired by Obama administration.â There are 100,000 employees in the DOJ. The thought that Barr would fire them all is ridiculous just on shear numbers and on top of that the vast majority are career employees who served under the Obama Administration (and prior Republican administrations) and CANâT be fired on a political whim. It would be against the law.
.
.
.
.WW, PHS
conan
February 13, 2020, 11:48pm
100
Again youâre not going to clean up the joint by only releasing 46 people out of 100 thousand.
What congress should have done when it was repugs hands, they should have cut their funds by 2/3rds.
You do understand Iâve been advocating that for decade plus now.
Trump budget purposed gives homeland security more money. I would cut that 2/3rds as well. I understand thatâs the job of congress thou.
If repugs are seriously about cutting spending and giving power back to the people thatâs where I would start.
Wouldnât you?