After the unrest we saw yesterday, will the dems use it as an excuse to place more restrictions on the first amendment? I have little doubt that the dems feel they must respond somehow, with some new law. That’s how they respond to everything. With the help of social media and big tech, they have been preparing us by slowly chipping away at free speech. Attempting to ban words they don’t approve of. So what do you think their response will be? And should we support anymore restrictions? Is anything that moves us closer to this a good idea?
I am a big fan of the 1st. I am also a big fan of defeating hate speech with good speech. I usually detest either side getting people fired for things they say even if it isn’t technically a violation of the 1st. I still think it violates the spirit of the 1st.
Congress should address election irregularities that can occur with early voting, mail-in ballots. What Americans want are elections that catch and prevent such irregularities. Perhaps the discussion should begin with in person voting and eliminating the jungle ballot. Each individual should have the choice between parties, not be limited to a choice of two people within the same party.
I totally agree. But it’s not going to happen. If they wanted to do this, they would have already done it. Pelosi and Schumer have no interest in transparent elections. They would prefer to insult those of us who are interested.
But the dems are sneaky. They don’t let on to their fascist agenda of total control of the people. They chip away at it in small increments. Have you noticed that the few who have contributed to the thread suddenly go quiet when you ask them specifics? And the rest don’t reply at all?
The agenda is sneaky. But it’s also obvious to anyone who is paying attention.
