I clearly stated, in my post, the following criteria for proving that it is true.
“And all they need to do is gather up and present the racist, homophobic, misogynistic, and xenophobic public statements that non-mentally-ill people make and get away with.”
You said there are “public” statements which fall into the “racist, homophobic, misogynistic, and xenophobic” categories. These “public” statements, by Disney employees, aren’t readily available, and would need to be discovered by lawyers.
Your entire premise is based on an assumption that would need to be proven by lawyers?
You have an interesting way of claiming victory in a debate.
Hey, while we all certainly know that there are a ■■■■ ton of racists in the Trump camp and republican side of the aisle compared to the anti Trump and democrat side, do you really think pissing off all of those racists on the right was the driving factor in ABC’s decision?
To me, as for this being a political left vs. right thing, it’s really a decent human being vs. ■■■■■■■ kind of thing. I mean, only ■■■■■■■■ would be upset about Roseanne being canned for this.
I join you in feeling bad for the other people involved with the show that are now out of work, but good people know that she had to go.
Had they waited until advertisers started dropping the show, they would have been accused of bowing to pressure- this way, the decision was Iger’s alone. He did the right thing.
They should continue the show without her character- maybe arrange to have her hit by a beer truck or something fitting like that.
it shows up here in a few posters pretty regularly. At first you think they are just contrarians. Then you realize it’s a “different personality” than the one the posted earlier under the same avatar.