Yeah…I like the hidden lies better from previous administrations. When you can’t see them at the time, even though the repercussions are serious, it doesn’t count…amirite?
So all sources are to be judged by who they are. Are you willing to engage with the content of the editorial or do you just judge people based on background characteristics. There’s a point in the editorial about Trump’s constant lying disqualifying him for the Presidency. Can you show the truth of Trump’s statements or do you think lying is acceptable. Or would you prefer to ignore that and dismiss the editorial out of hand.
If all ideas are to be judged on the basis of who said them, rather than the merits of the ideas, will politics even be possible.
There will be newspapers that endorse Trump and those that endorse his opponent and I hope we can rise above just denouncing any source we disagree with.
So the newspaper should gauge who they endorse based on Trump supporters at a Trump rally?
None of the editors or those involved in the decision to NOT endorse Trump cannot be from their formed opinions?