You’re normally much better at reading comprehension. Look at her words. Nothing but anti Trump yes, but with good reason. Trump was flipping out the vaccine wouldn’t be out before the election and making highly public comments about it. He was without a doubt putting pressure on people to hurry it up, against all ethical boundaries.
Already have. Scroll up. Get back to me when you’ve lost the desire to defend her.

Already have. Scroll up. Get back to me when you’ve lost the desire to defend her.
Gee, I must have missed them.
Anybody else see the anti-vax Harris quotes GWH posted?
You need reinforcements? Cute.

You need reinforcements? Cute.
No, I need help.
I can’t find them.

GWH:
Already have. Scroll up. Get back to me when you’ve lost the desire to defend her.
Gee, I must have missed them.
Anybody else see the anti-vax Harris quotes GWH posted?
Since she didn’t make any, that would be tough. And I don’t give a rats rear end about defending her. She’s an empty headed warm body and poc to fill the VP slot.

She most certainly did. From the linked article
“[T]hey’ll be muzzled, they’ll be suppressed, they will be sidelined, because he’s looking at an election coming up in less than 60 days, and he’s grasping for whatever he can get to pretend that he’s been a leader on this issue when he’s not,” Harris said during the CNN interview.
“I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about,” she added.
Here you go, @Kelby

DMK:
Supreme_War_Pig:
What in the world are you talking about?
I assume those that can’t get vaccinated are masking, social distancing, and other measures?
Perhaps I am misunderstanding your intent by agreeing with:
DisturbedGuy:
I reserve hate for a select few. Besides, delta is going to sort things out pretty quickly.
What do you then mean by saying “I hope so” in reply to that post?
Your fellow conservative poster has been adamant that we shouldn’t care at all about those who are unvaccinated. Do you disagree with him?
My hope is that as more anti vaxxers go down to the Delta variant, the rest of them will wise up. That is what I meant.

GWH:
She most certainly did. From the linked article
“[T]hey’ll be muzzled, they’ll be suppressed, they will be sidelined, because he’s looking at an election coming up in less than 60 days, and he’s grasping for whatever he can get to pretend that he’s been a leader on this issue when he’s not,” Harris said during the CNN interview.
“I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about,” she added.
Here you go, @Kelby
“The one developed by Pfizer that Kamala said she wouldn’t take because she was playing politics with peoples lives.”
I think you missed a piece in there…

I understand the desire to make it about me and I am flattered
I hope you have a great weekend
Folks keep promoting the vaccine it matters
Fine, but stick to the subject of the thread. This one is not about encouraging people to vaccinate, it’s about blame.

that I would not trust Donald Trump

GWH:
She most certainly did. From the linked article
“[T]hey’ll be muzzled, they’ll be suppressed, they will be sidelined, because he’s looking at an election coming up in less than 60 days, and he’s grasping for whatever he can get to pretend that he’s been a leader on this issue when he’s not,” Harris said during the CNN interview.
“I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he’s talking about,” she added.
Here you go, @Kelby
Here is more from the same interview which you left out. Seems kind of important.
“Yes. I trust Dr. Fauci,” Harris continued. She said she “would trust the word of public health experts and scientists, but not Donald Trump.”
Trust the experts, not Donald. Makes sense to me but I’m not trying to take Harris out of context to score political points.

The one developed by Pfizer that Kamala said she wouldn’t take because she was playing politics with peoples lives.
Do people really listen to Kamala when it comes to health decisions?
Allan

WuWei:
FloridaYankee:
WuWei:
FloridaYankee:
No she didn’t. Her detractors twisted misinterpretation of her words did.
Yes she did.
Hogwash.
She did and you know it. For an election.
You’re normally much better at reading comprehension. Look at her words. Nothing but anti Trump yes, but with good reason. Trump was flipping out the vaccine wouldn’t be out before the election and making highly public comments about it. He was without a doubt putting pressure on people to hurry it up, against all ethical boundaries.
Look at the timing of her running her cake hole. She undermined it. Created doubt.
Putting pressure on them to hurry up is not “against all ethical boundaries”. Did he order anybody to violate a law? A procedure?

Putting pressure on them to hurry up is not “against all ethical boundaries”.
But it’s not the best thing. I am sure you will agree.
He gave them warp speed. And then pressured them to go even faster.
It didn’t work.
He lost the election, the vaccine wasn’t approved until December long after the election was over.
Allan

WuWei:
Putting pressure on them to hurry up is not “against all ethical boundaries”.
But it’s not the best thing. I am sure you will agree.
He gave them warp speed. And then pressured them to go even faster.
It didn’t work.
He lost the election, the vaccine wasn’t approved until December long after the election was over.
Allan
No I don’t agree.

FloridaYankee:
WuWei:
FloridaYankee:
WuWei:
FloridaYankee:
No she didn’t. Her detractors twisted misinterpretation of her words did.
Yes she did.
Hogwash.
She did and you know it. For an election.
You’re normally much better at reading comprehension. Look at her words. Nothing but anti Trump yes, but with good reason. Trump was flipping out the vaccine wouldn’t be out before the election and making highly public comments about it. He was without a doubt putting pressure on people to hurry it up, against all ethical boundaries.
Look at the timing of her running her cake hole. She undermined it. Created doubt.
Putting pressure on them to hurry up is not “against all ethical boundaries”. Did he order anybody to violate a law? A procedure?
The numbers are the numbers with vaccine testing and there is no hurrying. Period. You wait until a sufficient number of people have had the vaccine and then you wait some more to see how it goes. There was literally, a guy watching the numbers who would not under any circumstances submit the findings until every last test subject up to the requirements was sufficiently proven out. Not one person short.
There is no hurry up involved.
I knew this during the testing. If I knew it, Trump knew it.

Transparency
I want to see all those on this forum who lost their ■■■■ when Kayleigh McEnany tested positive show a little honesty here. LOl I know, isn’t going to happen.
Not a single one would have been OK with this ■■■■ from a Trump WH but it’s Biden so…big ■■■■■■■ crickets.
You would think I would be used to the double standard by now. It’s gets shown so much around here.
Oh horse ■■■■ . If he hadn’t pressured them the bureaucrats would still be dragging their feet. Especially Fauci. Look at what he did to AIDS patients.
And it worked. There was a risk there, but they did what they said they couldn’t do.
And she threw water on it to win an election.

No I don’t agree.
Always apply pressure when developing a vaccine, that’s your theory huh.
I disagree. Give them the tools and cash and leave them the ■■■■ alone.
We will agree to disagree on this subject.
Allan

Look at what he did to AIDS patients.
Covid ain’t AIDS.
Allan