That has already been explained multiple times in these woke threads.
1 Like
But it’s not. Not in the case of bud light. They have been a strong supporter of lgbtq for at least 20 years, if not more.
They had ad featuring gay men in 2007. This was at the height of the “gay marriage debate”.
Was bud light not woke then?
Target… trans bathroom controversy in 2018. Conservatives boycotted. Were they not woke?
Nike… Colin Kap. Kneeler. Lots of controversy in 2016. Nike also features trans athletes in their ads. Were they not woke?
yes indeed it has
and ignored by some that number + 1 times
1 Like
no not like now everyone knows this
hence the customer disgust
the left never thinks what they are doing is wrong but just that they havent done enough of it yet
1 Like
It’s not woke to have gay men on ads, but it woke to have trans on ads?
Yeah … Keep your narrative straight, 
1 Like
I’ve said numerous times that anyone is welcome to offer a company and we can determine when they went woke and see if their stock performance improved or not since then.
Which has nothing to do with your cherry picking.
Target was brought up by someone else. Nike was brought up by me. Both boycotted by conservatives for being woke years ago.
Neither company went broke after woke.
Yep. More cherry picking.
1 Like
Quite the opposite. InBev is cherry-picked.
They are the outlier (for now).
They are both cherry picked. How can you deny it with a straight face.
1 Like
Maybe Bud Lite should try putting Barbie on their cans.
3 Likes
didn’t say of imply that.
“woke is a superpower”
< in larry king voice >. Still feel that way?
Yes.
InBev has doubled their stock since their gay ad in 2007.
ha.
you contradict yourself to death and you dont even care
Where did I contradict myself?
if you really dont know, which i highly doubt after repeated posts of mine, i’ll let you figure it out on your own
Don’t feed the trolls is always good advice. 
3 Likes
