ouch. big layoffs
and i bet those lefty marketing activists dont think they have anything to do with it
they’re nuts like that
If a bunch of laid off middle class workers doesn’t stick it to the trans, I really don’t know what will.
oh my….
you’d think this would be a lesson to any activists who want to inject their company into their pet lefty causes by putting mentally ill people on the products
i guess we’ll see
but the left never thinks what they are doing is wrong, but instead just haven’t done enough of it yet
If you have any unopened cans of Bud Light sitting around, hang on to them. They are going to be worth a lot of money as collector’s items in twenty or thirty years.
Especially the rarest cans of them all… The Mulvaney cans!
only takes one to apply leftism activism to the brand…

PurpnGold:
Samm:
If you have any unopened cans of Bud Light sitting around, hang on to them. They are going to be worth a lot of money as collector’s items in twenty or thirty years.
Especially the rarest cans of them all… The Mulvaney cans!
only takes one to apply leftism activism to the brand…
Unless you’re any other beer brand that celebrates pride month. They are safe

Unless you’re any other beer brand that celebrates pride month. They are safe
you play activist in marketing. you take the gamble with your base consumers

PurpnGold:
Unless you’re any other beer brand that celebrates pride month. They are safe
you play activist in marketing. you take the gamble with your base consumers
They all played activist for years prior… the snowflake right didn’t melt. Put a trans person on a can they’ve never and will never see…
Complete meltdown
not “meltdown” that’s what the left up and does after decades of aunt jemima, dr suess, uncle ben, land o lakes….
what you saw was “aversion.”. it wasn’t a fit. it was disgust.
and that’s why this brand hasn’t recovered.

not “meltdown” that’s what the left up and does after decades of aunt jemima, dr suess, uncle ben, land o lakes….
How many sales were impacted negatively prior to the changes? After?

and that’s why this brand hasn’t recovered.
The “left” is worse but once you answer the above question… you will understand how much of a lie that is. Bud like wont recover… but how did any of the brands listed above fair?

thinkingman:
PurpnGold:
Samm:
If you have any unopened cans of Bud Light sitting around, hang on to them. They are going to be worth a lot of money as collector’s items in twenty or thirty years.
Especially the rarest cans of them all… The Mulvaney cans!
only takes one to apply leftism activism to the brand…
Unless you’re any other beer brand that celebrates pride month. They are safe
I kind of hope the makers of all light beer go that route. The stuff ought to be off the shelves to make room for real beer.

How many sales were impacted negatively prior to the changes? After?
half a mile besides the point, because…

The “left” is worse but once you answer the above question… you will understand how much of a lie that is. Bud like wont recover… but how did any of the brands listed above fair?
…sales are a consequence of bad marketing decisions. you cant blame the consumer for being turned off of a product
and those products above weren’t being “activist” at all

PurpnGold:
How many sales were impacted negatively prior to the changes? After?
half a mile besides the point, because…
It is the point.
Did the left impact any of those brand’s financially

I kind of hope the makers of all light beer go that route
give it time
everyone seems to be on a mission to celebrate and glorify trans mental cases.

thinkingman:
PurpnGold:
Unless you’re any other beer brand that celebrates pride month. They are safe
you play activist in marketing. you take the gamble with your base consumers
They all played activist for years prior… the snowflake right didn’t melt. Put a trans person on a can they’ve never and will never see…
Complete meltdown
Yep … at Anheuser-Busch corporate headquarters … like butter on a hot summer day.

It is the point.
Did the left impact any of those brand’s financially
no. you’re trying to make it your point
the left was free to avoid those priducts if they wished. but that wasnt good enough. they are after all pure authoritarians.

PurpnGold:
It is the point.
Did the left impact any of those brand’s financially
no. you’re trying to make it your point
the left was free to avoid those priducts if they wished. but that wasnt good enough. they are after all pure authoritarians.
But the left didn’t avoid those products. There was no boycott… for any of them. No financial impact whatsoever.