They didn’t decide that. They discussed that. They lied for the same reason Don Jr did I suppose, to save the country from being distracted by this witch hunt.
They decided. They “discussed” wearing a wire and convincing others to join them.
That doesn’t make any sense. They’re lying about doing their duty to avoid a witch hunt? At least the flag officers resigned.
I didn’t buy into removing Obama…hell I’ve never made single post about his birth BS.
Now having said that I wouldn’t have mind if he lost his reflection with Romney even thou I didn’t vote for him.
Hell I’ve even came out and said we might have dodge a bullet with Obama concerning McCain.
To to allow unelected bureaucrats to think they run this country is dangerous and we’re seeing the results of it.
But libs support this…liberals don’t.
And thus the difference between the two.
They discussed wearing a wire and getting others to join them but decided not to go there.
You put the decision first, I put it last. Neither of us can prove either, but we do know it went no further so you’re version seems less likely.
Obama did absolutely nothing to warrant removal.
Neither has Trump. So far.
Glad we could agree on they were plotting sedition.
I don’t understand this?
Agreed…and most of us didn’t support or even discussed it.
So you’re admitting they conspired…is that what you’re saying?
I asked that because I had JUST acknowledged that YOU were not making the claim, but you lashed out as if I had said that of you.
I wasn’t being hostile-given your response to me, it didn’t appear you had read the words I had JUST typed.
I literally JUST said:
I know you didn’t, but there are a few in this thread who do believe that, and that it the major point of controversy in this thread right now.
And you followed up with:
I haven’t said that it is sedition to discuss this.
Seemed you missed that part of what I said.
If that’s what they meant, that’s what they would have said. The 25th isn’t like the 2nd, written 200 years ago with no direct clarification found otherwise the document. The 25th was very clear-it allows an action, and nowhere describes a need for justification for that action, other than those personnel mentioned taking action.
Trump did. That makes him a traitor, apparently. Or maybe a seditionist. Who knows. Doesn’t matter. He’s president now and above the law.
Point out the anti Hillary emails that were found. Point out the empolyees of the FBI and DOJ that were talking about making sure Hillary was not elected. Point out the FBI agents that have been shown to be against Hillary.
The IG report pointed to issues with the FBI and DOJ being to lenient and giving Hillary a pass.
And they can sent any email they want but when it is found their employment should be terminated because it shows that they were not able to do their jobs by leaving their political bias at the door when they came into work.
The fake media did complain about anti Hillary rhetoric but the problem for you is it didn’t come from the FBI or DOJ it came from the other side of the aisle.
I have disliked Hillary from when Bill was in office and she proved with her own words and actions what kind of person she was. Hillary thought she could ride Bills coattails and the vote for me because I am a woman and I deserve to be president into the white house but people who liked Bill had an unfavorable view of her by her past actions.
If the process was followed to the end, with 2/3rds of both Houses voting to remove the President under 25-4… what do you think that the decision would be?
Discussing isn’t deciding.
This is a false statement. The IG report found no such “issues”.
Because they didn’t have the support or the legal means…so they taken another route.
But their intentions was clear. Removing Trump by any means necessary even abusing laws that was given to them. Such as FISA and other tools.
They didn’t take “another route”.
And the rest of your post is CEC claptrap.
Huh? It was written 50 years ago (what difference does that make?) and where else is the 25th clarification found? The 2nd is even more clear. To wit: Shall not be infringed.
Sure they did.
Is that necessary?