Oh I completely agree with you, I was being somewhat sarcastic in my post, although the way that quote was worded could be interpreted that way. There are certain women who can do fine in certain roles, but most women are not built for combat and are not psychologically wired for it. Regarding aerial warfare I’m not sure I agree, in particularly when it comes to aerial combat and attack roles. I would’t put my money on a fighter squadron of women out performing or being as effective as a fighter squadron of men.
I disagree and the second statement is quite simply not true. Drafting females would have freed up men for combat arms. As far back as Vietnam the tooth to tail ratio was 1:12 and it has grown every year since then.
I wonder if the country, with its drastically different culture in regards to the relationship between men and women back then, would have tolerated it though.
Does the ruling mean that men who did not register for the draft are free from prosecution? Would that apply to men from the Vietnam era who left the country?
Can men sue for benefits that have been denied for failing to register?
I don’t see why anyone has to register for selective service unless there IS a draft. My brother never registered when he turned 18 and that was long after the draft ended.
As I posted, my brother never registered for selective service when he turned 18 and he still got a student loan. (but then again that was a very long time ago)
I highly doubt that the US will ever have to institute a draft in my lifetime, maybe never. I find the question interesting from a sociological perspective, in other words equality is fine when it pertains to desirable things not necessarily undesirable things like being on the front lines in a war.
There’s more stress involved, dealing with high g-force maneuvers, AAA flying at you. Actual combat situations have gotten the better of many male pilots, it’s hard to imagine that a squadron of female pilots not having more of a difficult time. I would be curious if any types of studies have been conducted?
Why just women? Why aren’t men given that same choice?
Sorry, men have had to deal with this forever, it’s time to include women as well.
On the bright side for both sides, if women are subject to the draft it probably means the chances its ever instituted go way down. So, in this respect having women subject to the draft protects men as well. Even if they implement it, only half the number of men will be called up over the previous model as the other half will be women.
There were people who volunteered for Vietnam and I’m sure many volunteered for WW2 especially after Pearl Harbor and in both cases knowing the costs. So in relation to my question how many women would volunteer for combat roles if a major crises arose today vs men?