True, can it be less?
True.
True, can it be less?
True.
American imperialism and exceptionalism.
Until âAmerican interestsâ become exclusively government interests.
Yes.
âŚ
âStabilityâ as defined byâŚ
âOther functionsâ?
That hasnât been true for the US for 2 generations.
Itâs just a generic term for what is actually happening.
Which areas are private American entities not present where we give aid? Or which areas where we seek stability in order to prevent terrorists like isis from taking hold and recruiting Americans to drive trucks through New Orleans
Imperialism isnât hyperbolic. Itâs just a thing that is.
Isnât it incredible how naive some of these radical leftists allow themselves to be when it comes to the idea of giving aid for goodness of heart? Itâs as if theyâre just talking out of their ignorant asses because theyâre jonesing for more Orange Crack.
FreeAndClear:
Soft power is done in support of imperialism. I am not sure why there is even an argument over this. USAID is done specifically to support American interests that are often completely unrelated to the aid. Itâs not a bad thing. Itâs just a thing.
Until âAmerican interestsâ become exclusively government interests.
Thatâs very difficult to assess
WuWei:
FreeAndClear:
Soft power is done in support of imperialism. I am not sure why there is even an argument over this. USAID is done specifically to support American interests that are often completely unrelated to the aid. Itâs not a bad thing. Itâs just a thing.
Until âAmerican interestsâ become exclusively government interests.
Thatâs very difficult to assess
Is it? I donât think so.
Rubio said. "But if you go to mission after mission, and embassy after embassy around the world, you will often find that in many cases USAID is involved in programs that run counter to what weâre trying to do and our national strategy with that country or that region.
Here you go.
National strategy could still mean just government since he is govenrment employee and i love that quote.