Ahmaud Arbery Case

Use AI to handle the smaller stuff and save the judges and lawyers for the high stakes.

Estonia’s Plan

Estonia’s chief data officer is a 28-year-old graduate student named Ott Velsberg, who is tasked with inserting AI into the government functions of nation of 1.3 million people.

Specifically, Velsberg and his team are tasked with creating a “robot judge” to adjudicate small claims cases in the hopes it will clear a backlog of small cases.

The theory is that parties to a lawsuit will upload documents and other relevant information and the AI will issue a decision that can be appealed to a human judge. Likely, this will begin as a pilot program and require tweaking based upon feedback from parties and lawyers.

Yeah. I don’t see how it could be anything but that. Multiple life sentences.

In fact, it better be that, for all three guys. (Maybe the shooter will get more multiple life sentences than the others.)

Giving the possibility of parole may be enough.

Doesn’t life usually work out to was it seven or thirteen?

Minimum time served of a life sentence in Georgia before one can go before the parole board is 30 years. Gregory McMichael would be 95.

This doesn’t strike me as something worthy of happiness to be in agreement over. It was a tragically stupid (and clear as day) murder, and these do-gooder jackasses are getting less than they deserve. The animals are even gonna be fed for crying out loud.

Cool. Imagine being that stupid at sixty five. Someone should count his neurons.

1 Like

No it wasn’t. Pictures don’t have to be seen on the same day for the person in the picture to be identified as a suspect.

They would have had to prove that the men went after him to kill him.

That’s probably true, but that’s not why they rendered guilty verdicts. The men were guilty. We all knew that going in and no facts were presented to overrule that opinion.

Well, duh. What makes you think that conservatives at-large thought any differently?

Because we stood behind Rittenhouse. Obviously, that was because he was white. In this trial we were supposed to throw out the facts and opine in support of the white men as well. Libs are funny like that. :wink:

1 Like

What’s your point? Do you think they were innocent?

Quit making ■■■■ up. Nobody said they had the right to detain him.

No he didn’t. Read it again.

Some folks here have an overwhelming need to be holier-than-thou. :wink:

You mean other than in the video surveillance? Twice?

So you admit, Ashli was shot for trespassing. Progress. :+1:

Just a reminder. The initial investigation of the incident determined there was no wrong doing by the murderers. It was only after videos were released to the media that charges were filed.

1 Like

Huh?

Who said there was nothing wrong?

If this guy was a robber, it should have been police only, not these imbeciles.

I have no idea whether this victim was also a criminal, although the videos of him roaming the house being constructed a number of times, is suspicious enough to warrant police investigation, not sloughing off.

I haven’t followed this case closely because it seemed at first glance sort of open and shut. But, without the video then wouldn’t what happened be sort of uncontested by any living person? Just as, without video, Rittenhouse would have given one story against the rest. Grosskretuz even initially lied to police that he had dropped his pistol before confronting Rittenhouse. This would no doubt be considered a fact without the video.
Good thing there are videos.

1 Like