Samm
August 21, 2020, 9:50pm
142
W_and_C:
Not sure what you’re talking about exactly. The “Am I wrong?” question was solely pertaining to the hypothetical whether it’s better to have 15 people killed as opposed to 20.
Which I still say yes to. I want those 5 people to live their full lives and I don’t care who knows it.
I am pro-life when it comes to those five !
What about the lives of people who use guns to save their lives? Are you pro-life regarding them?
You are playing a foolish game of hypotheticals. There is no way to know how many more or how many fewer lives would have been spared or lost if the gunman had used a different weapon. Each incident is unique. None of the circumstances of one incident carries over to another. Well, except for those incidents where the gunman was stopped by a possible victim who was armed, which almost certainly saved the lives of many other potential victims.
1 Like
Samm
August 21, 2020, 9:55pm
143
That’s probably because you never owed any of the guns that were “grabbed” in California. Californian is a glaring example of government grabbing guns.
1 Like
Samm
August 21, 2020, 9:58pm
144
WCD9973:
WuWei:
Biden is not in charge
Yes he is
He’s not even remotely in charge. He’s barely even a figurehead.
Samm
August 21, 2020, 10:07pm
145
“First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out— because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.” - Martin Niemöller
W_and_C
August 21, 2020, 10:15pm
146
Samm:
W_and_C:
Not sure what you’re talking about exactly. The “Am I wrong?” question was solely pertaining to the hypothetical whether it’s better to have 15 people killed as opposed to 20.
Which I still say yes to. I want those 5 people to live their full lives and I don’t care who knows it.
I am pro-life when it comes to those five !
What about the lives of people who use guns to save their lives? Are you pro-life regarding them?
You are playing a foolish game of hypotheticals. There is no way to know how many more or how many fewer lives would have been spared or lost if the gunman had used a different weapon. Each incident is unique. None of the circumstances of one incident carries over to another. Well, except for those incidents where the gunman was stopped by a possible victim who was armed, which almost certainly saved the lives of many other potential victims.
The person I was responding to suggested the hypothetical which is what I responded to, that’s all that’s happened here. No idea what you’re going on about.
Samm
August 21, 2020, 10:23pm
147
Read my post. It’s self explanatory.
W_and_C
August 21, 2020, 10:29pm
148
Well, like I said , I was playing off a hypothetical suggested by another poster so you’d probably want to take it up with them .
After the dems ban AR-15’s then what?
Grizzly bears launch the attack they’ve long been planning.
What’s funny about you quoting this poem is the search results for your history of the word socialist.
You’d think an ability to recite Martin Niemöller would have included the point sinking in.
“Take the guns first, go through due process second.”
The difference being of course, that Trump was talking ■■■■■ Libs are actively pursuing non-due process seizures.
He would take your guns in a heartbeat if the purpose served him.
What legislation has he or any Republican proposed to do that?
Which liberal banned bump stocks?
WuWei
August 22, 2020, 1:42am
159
He crawfished right off that one, didn’t he.
Bigjohn
August 22, 2020, 2:08am
160
As long as I can keep my 20 and 12 gauges for clays I have no issues. Mind I am not paranoid or insecure in my masculinity
WuWei
August 22, 2020, 2:44am
161
Neither am I. I’m a grown man, I don’t need to play games for plastic trophies.
2 Likes
