In his deposition for the Paula Jones lawsuit, Clinton denied having “sexual relations” with Monica Lewinsky. On the basis of the evidence provided by [Monica Lewinsky], Ken Starr concluded that this sworn testimony was false and perjurious.
I can remember Ted Koppel on the old Nightline asking, when a special counsel was selected for Clinton, “What are we doing to ourselves” with all these special counsel investigations.
He had enthusiastically supported the special counsel under Reagan.
It depends on ox ownership, as usual. Vanity Fair seems to be a little ahead on this.
At this point, I await the possibility of an actual crime by Trump. If there is none, then we definitely need a thorough investigation of how this started and why.
Saying bad things about Trump and his administration in the report wont do anything to justify the investigation. That will just make it opposition research for the DNC paid for by the taxpayers.
I don’t think any serious person said that the hacking of the DNC would not be a crime and should not be investigated. That is not what this whole two year (Mueller and the FBI before him) investigation is about.
I think “Trump is cool” posts are lazy. And dodgy.
No need, because you already know that the SP against Clinton was supposed to be investigating shady real estate deals that had nothing to with nooky in the Oval Office. And you’re perfectly content with that investigation getting Clinton on unrelated charges. But now that it’s happening to your favorite Dear Leader…oh, it’s just TDS.
Reading the entire article for the first time, it’s a warning to dems they got nothing on Trump but “sleaze”, so nothing legal… Vanity Fair is a leftist org. It’s an attempt to let you down slowly. It’s foretelling the end of the Mueller investigation and it’s lack of evidence for collusion and is a historic article in that sense…