Removing Birthright Citizenship
I voted no. Though I do not like the results in many, many cases, if your are born here, you are born here. That really should be enough.
As for the anchor baby argument. If the parents don’t make the effort to become citizens, then toss them on the child’s 21st birthday.
True. Some of my wife’s co-workers have made it through the citizenship process, given what I know about them, it cannot be all that difficult.
I gave 21 years as a threshold, surely the process can be completed in that time frame.
She is also proud to be a citizen of her country. And she has a few years on her. She’s not interested in voting nor politics. Not interested in being a US citizen.
She us interested in living with her man and being left alone. Exactly like I was when I was a permanent resident of her country.
Our son is a citizen and has been since birth. Her permanent resident status suits her just fine.
Why should she have to become a US citizen?
In our arrogance, we assume everybody wants to be a US citizen? Well, that’s not true.
Exactly. She sounds like a close family friend we had. She was South Korean, married a US soldier, and came back with him. For a long time, she didn’t want to become a citizen; had no desire to get into our politics or anything else. Being a permanent resident ended up making it easier for her to travel back to South Korea to see her mom every year with the way their laws work. After her mom died, she decided to become a US citizen and renounced her South Korean citizenship since she had been here for over 35 years at that point and since her mom passed she doesn’t plan on ever going back. Her siblings all live in Japan or in the US now.