WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:34pm
43
FloridaYankee:
I should think that would be self evident. For example: I was twenty minutes away from the Sandy Hook massacre. All three of our daughters played sports on school fields right there in the town and they were still of school age when it happened. We could have easily been there, and that ain’t no hype. We knew kids, coaches and teachers in their system.
That’s some damn hard ■■■■ to explain to your daughters. It’s not just friends and family that are effected by travesties like that, there are thousands of others with varying levels of connections to it, some direct, some less so. That hit our family hard, and to say it was traumatic does not feel like an overstatement.
Valid points all, in your personal case. That kind of proximity is not usually the case. How about Las Vegas? Were you just as traumatized?
And it seems we move on relatively quickly and even more so if the event not what we expect it to be. For example, the type of weapon used.
We will keep being traumatized by an event with an “assault rifle” long after we forget one with a pistol or something else. Or a lower body count. Or one in which a citizen made a difference.
I understand your feelings about Sandy Hook.
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:35pm
44
I tend to agree and it will be hard to convince me otherwise. It’s prior restraint.
1 Like
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:38pm
45
I can’t agree with that. You know as well as I do the vast majority of the species has never and will never be personally affected by these event and are basing their perception of them on media driven images.
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:39pm
46
I believe it impossible. They are incompatible concepts.
SixFoot
September 7, 2019, 1:40pm
47
Apologies for bringing up something so far off topic. I just feel like the prior extinction events may be part of why people naturally dream of things trying to kill them even at an age where nothing adverse has happened yet.
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:42pm
49
It’s not off topic at all. You could very well be right. The drive to survive is very strong.
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 1:45pm
50
How many times have we found out after the fact that the perpetrator was known to police prior to the final event?
And we think making more people known to police is going to help … how? The police blame laws (rights).
How much power are we willing to give police to “save” us?
Bodecea
September 7, 2019, 1:53pm
51
Stop asking awkward questions.
DMK:
I think the point is people are going to find a way to kill others because they are mentally ill or are terrorists. The Boston Bombers didn’t use guns, terrorists strap bombs to themselves. London is rife with stabbings to the point knives are banned.
Where does it end? By taking guns away from legal, sane gun owners who have the absolute right to protect their personhood, home and families? Because that seems to be the agenda for some and and growing in popularity.
Why is it we had kids back 20 years ago who could handle guns and no gun violence like we see today? Heck, we used to have rednecks at our highschool with a gun mounted in the back window of their trucks.
What has changed between then and now? IMO, a lot has to do with the breakdown of the family and support for families to stay together. Kids need discipline and guidance and they are not getting it. They are not being equipped to mentally deal with the real world or are being put on meds they probably don’t need to be taking. Every kid who was rambunctious in class was labeled ADHD… But, hey. No P.E. anymore to let kids blow off steam as they need to do.
My point being we are not going to solve this problem without understanding the cause of it to begin with. I’m sure many good people are working on solving that puzzle.
But, gun control is just a bandaid to make people feel better. If our politicians really cared about gun control they’d crack down on Chicago, but mums the word there along with gangs and the criminal element that commits most of the crimes .
Great points. I think the break down of the family is a substantial part of the problem as well.
Also good points about the way the politicians ignore places like Chicago and all the gang shootings there.
SixFoot
September 7, 2019, 2:23pm
53
Known history of violent tendencies.
"Anti-"psychotic medications.
Racist tendencies.
Well then I guess we shouldn’t worry about illegal immigrants murdering people either
Jezcoe
September 7, 2019, 2:48pm
55
That would seem that someone wouldn’t need to carry a gun for protection.
A hammer will do.
Much more lethal.
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 2:51pm
56
You don’t seem to grasp the concept of “winning”.
1 Like
SixFoot
September 7, 2019, 2:53pm
57
Some folks appear to think that a fair fight is fair.
1 Like
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 2:56pm
58
Those folks have never been in a fight. Of course they will claim they grew up in 8 Mile.
1 Like
Bodecea
September 7, 2019, 2:58pm
59
As opposed to denying that little children were even killed, as per Alex Jones?
SixFoot
September 7, 2019, 2:58pm
60
Understandable. They probably think biting and eye gouging are somehow off-limits too.
I pray they never find themselves on the defensive.
SixFoot
September 7, 2019, 2:58pm
61
Stop watching Alex Jones, you’ll turn into a… never mind. lol
2 Likes
WuWei
September 7, 2019, 2:59pm
62
As do I, the shock alone might kill them.
1 Like