84 days of withhold aid drama

[Munimula1]

True, but the reason the democrats hold the majority is because a majority of US voters wanted them there.

[WorldWatcher]

@Smyrna

@WorldWatcher

Yes, it’s a sad day that the GOP didn’t have the testicular fortitude to stand up and tell Trump “No, you can’t abuse the Office of the President for your personal political reelection campaign.”

You mean…having your son on the board of a company you personally deem as corrupt and get compensated huge sums of money is not corrupt? Just because Joe is running for POTUS does not excuse this. Ambassador Sondland testified that President Trump specifically stated…“no quid pro quo…just do the right thing”. What was the right thing IYO? Let this go? Ignore it?

#1 Biden wasn’t running for POTUS when Hunter was appointed to the board. But I agree bad optics. Feel free to have Trump order Barr to open an investigation Biden IMHO, though nothing will come of it.

#2 Sondland testified - IIRC - that the “no quid pro quo” comment was made AFTER the Whistleblower report and the House started investigating. So cry crocodile tears on Trump claiming no abuse of power for a benefit for his personal political campaign AFTER the fact had become public.

#3 Is Trump employing Rudy’s sun for a nice salary as Sport Liaison in the White House whose only qualification is he played golf in college and he often acts as a partner for Trump not corrupt?
.
.
.
.WW, PHS

[NuffSaid]

@Smyrna

What happened to the testimony of the “whistleblower”?

Not needed. Several other people have already corroborated his/her story.

[NuffSaid]

@Camp

Don’t forget the secret bunkers.

That will be a more interesting footnote.

There were no secret bunkers that’s just a myth played out by Trump*, idiot Nunes, And a.m. radio

[Weedhopper]

You can bring up Trump with holding aid for evaluation all you want, it won’t change the fact that Politicians families have been banking off of that same foreign aid under Obama.

[Chris]

@Medicswife2002

He was impeached by house Dems and only the house Dems to be precise.

There was one Independent (Former GOP) House member who voted to impeach Trump.

[Weedhopper]

Story is right!

[WuWei]

@adroit

Indeed, it would scare our founding fathers that one side is completely protecting a president who abused his office to push for a foreign nation to interfere in our electoral process by announcing an investigation into his top political rival.

No it wouldn’t.

[WuWei]

And that he got reelected.

[WuWei]

■■■■ Hamilton.

[LucyLou]

@Smyrna

It all matters to me and how I work is, I start with the largest and oldest problems first. Long before I get to this, there are matters that are far larger and more important to this country, that have not been dealt with. Now I know the NYT and many other lib sources would like to ignore and skip those matters and only concentrate on Trump. I hear the sheople bleeting the same things but not me. I want what Horowitz exposed…dealt with…correctly. Once Durham finishes investigating what Horowitz scratched the surface of, I can then move on to newer potential problems…and not until.

Smart move.

Pick something in the past and choose to never pay attention to the present. The herd of independent thinkers nod, shrug, meekly look away. Amirite? Moos and more moos.

[SeaManatee]

I prefer the direct approach. Trump is cool.

[LucyLou]

@Rodeo

Will you also tell your kids there’s a process, whereby the subpoena’s can be taken before a judge to determine their ultimate validity and that rather than following that process the Dem’s in this case chose to just run roughshod over it?

Just curious to test your honesty here.

Congress has subpoena power.

[Plasmaball]

It’s an opinion piece that links to the New York times article which I would post but its paywalled.

Like I said addressed…

[WuWei]

@LucyLou

@Rodeo

Will you also tell your kids there’s a process, whereby the subpoena’s can be taken before a judge to determine their ultimate validity and that rather than following that process the Dem’s in this case chose to just run roughshod over it?

Just curious to test your honesty here.

Congress has subpoena power.

And the executive has privilege.

[Plasmaball]

Impeachment is a partisan process…

[Camp]

…and a great election meddling tool.

If you can get your message out.

[Plasmaball]

Actually there is no record of that phone call where he states that.

You were lied to. Again…as usual.

[Plasmaball]

To an extent. Not absolute

[WorldWatcher]

@Plasmaball

Actually there is no record of that phone call where he states that.

You were lied to. Again…as usual.

@Plasmaball

Might I suggest an edit to “Factually incorrect.” Instead of the pronoun sentence. Seems the way to survive on the board now.
.
.
.
.WW, PHS