You guys got him now.
Let us know how it all turns out.
1 Like
Looking like we all will be getting enriched on how low the Dems stooped to across America sooner than later.
Keep that home fire burning.
Come again?
What do you have to say about this Tina Peters, an elected official in Mesa County, Colorado who is under attack for daring to preserve a copy of her officeâs Dominion Server under the premise it could avoid altering or destroying election data?
This is a repeat. Weâve already discussed it and nothing new has come up that I know of. It looks to like she did something illegal but her defense is that it needed to be done and she is a whistleblower. We will have to see if the AG or a jury agree with her.
I did post that Lauren Boebert defended the AG in this case which takes some air out of the claim that this is all just a partisan attack against her.
I am curious what you think of the Maricopa election boards rebuttals to the cyber ninja report. I posted it a few days back:
https://community.hannity.com/t/2020-election-fraud-thread-part-2/237765/6242
They refute a huge percentage of the âpossible fraudâ cases that were referred to the AG by Fann.
They also add a lot more color to how the name/address/registration matching was performed by Cyber Ninjas and how itâs deficiencies inflated the number of ballots flagged as suspicious.
Listen to these concerns raised in Wisconsin.
https://www.oann.com/wis-assembly-holds-hearing-on-voter-registration/
Isnât that the lady that got caught trying to change voting machines to allow back door access?
Now sheâs grifting for her defense fund. The left wonât take her down. Her actions will.
1 Like
âŚand well you should. The answer most likely is because it wasnât what they wanted regurgibleated.
And that âelections expertâ is just regurgibleeting bad information. While he points to state numbers and the AP article above points to only one jurisdictions (hence the difference in the number of people), the explanation has been provided over-and-over-and-over again.
But some sheeple just have to repeat the big lie.
As a database person, yes Virginia, when fields are required in a data conversion you pick a common and recognizable value for consistency purposes. When itâs a beginning day I usually use 01/01/1900. However neither article mentions that for those conversion records with 01/01/1918, the reason that date was chosen is because another previously not required field from the various paper records was the date of birth and for that 01/01/1900 was used. Therefore the registration date was set to 18 years after that. With data formatted for dates, the date fields cannot hold text, so a date must be used. When Iâm converting text data with a NULL value into a required field, I will typically use âHistoricalâ as a value which then allows a differentiation between old and newer records. But with a date field that wonât hold text, not so easy. [EDIT: Also we use an âEnd of Timeâ date for date tracking as 12/31/4000, a date we can query on, but no one expects any of our EEs to be still with us in the year 4000.]
So much for this âexpertâ.
WW
2 Likes
Then heâs not an expert if what youâre saying is true but he was portrayed as better than that. TrulyâŚI wouldnât know. Iâm trusting those involved at this level in Wisconsin to be neutral, in search of the truth and this is their âexpertâ and this is what he provided.
But you brought it up, again.
This false claim about 1/1/1918 cycles through repeatedly, the reason is given. Then conveniently âforgotâ and recycled again.
WW
If itâs false, then his expertise is lacking. What I want is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth and until Iâm satisfied that thatâs whatâs being told, Iâll keep waiting for it. Due to the powers that be, this is taking a long time but in time, I believe the âtruthâ of the election will be revealed. If you think youâve already heard all there is needed to make up your mind, be comforted. Iâm not.
However, when the âtruthâ is presented itâs ignored. Time passes and the same falsehoods get repeated as if there is something new being presented.
The 1/1/1918 dates in Wisconsin is one example.
Pulling âsuitcasesâ out from under tables is another when in fact they were valid ballot storage bins waiting to be counted.
Another is âvotes being delivered in unmarked vans in the middle of the nightâ when in fact is as a news organization moving electronic equipment.
.
.
.
.
.
Which appears that there are some (not saying you personally here) fall into the above.
WW
2 Likes
It wasnât the pulling of suitcases at the Fulton County arena, itâs the FACT observers were sent home. The excuse is, it was due to a miscommunication. Observing the video, the counting began before the observers had time to reach the cars in the parking lot. SoâŚif it was truly due to a âmiscommunicationâ, it could have been easily rectifiedâŚbut it wasnât. Why is that?
No itâs not, the FACT is that some of the election staff (âcuttersâ) were originally released and the observers CHOOSE to leave when that was announced.
They were welcome to have stayed and there is no requirement that observers be present, just that they are allowed if they CHOOSE.
And the entire counting process was video taped.
WW
If you canât trust âLetâs Go Brandon Newsâ⌠who can you trust?
4 Likes
Optics were poor nonetheless. Observers going home for the night and then those suitcases come out is what you apparently believe is not much of a concern, others feel something smells fishy.
