When I was working as an accountant for a university. ■■■■■■■■■■■ realize I did that.
When I was working as an accountant for a university. ■■■■■■■■■■■ realize I did that.
Libs voted for him and defended his policies for 4 years. You were right here defending it.
Big crowd of lib protestors in DC today.
You asked the question. I was just providing some input.
How many in 2018 and 2019?
illegal crossings: 450k in 2018, jumping to 850k in 2019. But back down to 400k in 2020.
deportations: 287k in 2018, 271k in 2019.
You asked the question. I was just providing some input.
The implication was that Trump simply continue Biden’s policies and will simply take credit.
But what LIBs continue to overlook is the exponential increase in illegal crossings under Biden. While 250k deportations seems like a large number, it is a drop in the bucket with 3 million illegal crossings.
There will be a dramatic change in border policy, beginning day 1. LIBs can take that to the bank.
Viginia hats were out in force today.
Perfect sense to start in sanctuary cities.
There are probably more illegals there.
If illegals are such a burden, why not relieve the red cities first as a reward for supporting trump?
I’m confused. Are you implying that we have daily roundups of illegals today under Biden and that Trump will be simply continuing Biden’s policy of daily roundups?
Of course.
You think we aren’t rounding up criminal illegals now?
He’s also going to make credit for the currently low border crossings, and less than full detention centers.
Viginia hats were out in force today.
Not surprised.
Viginia hats were out in force today.
Oh God…silly people. Libs best and brightest.
gooddad409:Perfect sense to start in sanctuary cities.
There are probably more illegals there.
If illegals are such a burden, why not relieve the red cities first as a reward for supporting trump?
I love the IF thrown in there like that’s somehow debatable
If illegals are such a burden, why not relieve the red cities first as a reward for supporting trump?
Because we want the headlines that libs cities are impending law enforcement and harboring illegals. Then justice department can go after those cities.
tnt:If illegals are such a burden, why not relieve the red cities first as a reward for supporting trump?
I love the IF thrown in there like that’s somehow debatable
Then answer the question,
Steel-W0LF: tnt:If illegals are such a burden, why not relieve the red cities first as a reward for supporting trump?
I love the IF thrown in there like that’s somehow debatable
Then answer the question,
Sure.
“Why not relieve the red cities first?”
Because the optic of liberals refusing to follow the law and being cuffed and dragged out of office will be political gold.
He’s also going to make credit for the currently low border crossings
What low border crossings do you speak of? There were 3 million illegal crossings in 2024. Contrast that with 400k the year Trump left office.
tnt:He’s also going to make credit for the currently low border crossings
What low border crossings do you speak of? There were 3 million illegal crossings in 2024. Contrast that with 400k the year Trump left office.
For three and half years libs constantly argued the following, which I’ll post again:
The only Trump executive order that had any meaningful impact on the border was title 42.
For three and half years this was the go to line of @PurpnGold, @biggestal99, @Jezcoe, etc., although now they are changing their tune.
peek-a-boo: tnt:He’s also going to make credit for the currently low border crossings
What low border crossings do you speak of? There were 3 million illegal crossings in 2024. Contrast that with 400k the year Trump left office.
For three and half years libs constantly argued the following, which I’ll post again:
The only Trump executive order that had any meaningful impact on the border was title 42.
For three and half years this was the go to line of @PurpnGold, @biggestal99, @Jezcoe, etc., although now they are changing their tune.
What tune am I changing?
So you are fully expecting the record number of encounters, crossings, gotaways, etc., for Trump that happened under Biden.
So you are fully expecting the record number of encounters, crossings, gotaways, etc., for Trump that happened under Biden.
No because there is no reason for Trump to remove the EOs that Biden put in place.
Also, I expect the economy to slow down more under Trump and usually southern immigration slows down when the economy is bad.