1st Amendment and Schools - Punishment for Off Campus Social Media

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:09pm

If the “teacher” is stupid enough to think this is endangering a child they should be fired and laughed out of town.

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:09pm

Making a kid not come to school is not punitive. What the kid’s parents will do to him is.

The school is simply refusing to allow him entrance until the parents have had an opportunity to adjust his clutch.

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:10pm

Just cite the portion of it that requires reporting if nerf guns are in the home.

PurpnGold · January 2, 2021, 9:10pm

That wasn’t the case I was talking about.

I was talking about a Colorado case

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:11pm

PurpnGold:

WuWei:

@PurpnGold you do bring up an interesting point with this zoom tangent.

It has a relatively easy, albeit absurd, fix. The parents simply need to adapt their homes to the standards of the Karen teachers so vapors aren’t given.

If for example I had a 1st grader and wanted him doing class in the kitchen, I could simply make sure there were no butcher knives on the counter or pots cooking on the stove in the background.

I could completely sanitize one room so there was no danger of Academic Annie being offended by anything she sees in my home because she’s stupid.

The question is; should I have to?

Good question.

I think a parent who wants to hide something during those calls could easily do so. So I think the parents who are truly dangerous won’t be displaying anything that would tip the teacher off.

The student could still show signs of abuse… be the environment would not be an indicator

So your point in all this is…

RTchoke · January 2, 2021, 9:12pm

Point to the section that indicates having a firearm in the home is child endangerment and ONLY having a firearm in the home is endangerment.

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:12pm

Still want to go with “the teacher thought he was endangered”?

WorldWatcher · January 2, 2021, 9:12pm

B.L. is the minor who the case in the OP is actually about.

She promised to follow a code of ethics for being on the team, she broke her promise.

But y’all(c) are more interested in turning this thread into something about child endangerment and guns instead of the actual subject of the O.P.
.
.
.
.WW, PSHS

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:13pm

Then provide a link to it and something under the law that makes it reportable.

RTchoke · January 2, 2021, 9:15pm

It has followed the general theme of what authority the school has to dictate off campus behavior.

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:15pm

Nerf gun.

Under what section of CO law is that reportable as neglect, abuse, or child endangerment?

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:17pm

I don’t think it’s the same case. Mine is in Michigan.

But you’re right, we’re a bit off track.

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:21pm

The code of ethics does not require students to respect other students, coaches, teachers, staff, or not to use profanity off campus on their own time away from school activities.

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:21pm

Yes, but now we’re stuck on a tangent. Lower looping.

WorldWatcher · January 2, 2021, 9:21pm

You are right, different case.

I had just finished reading up on the Mahanoy Area School District case which is coming up on the SCOTUS Conference.

My bad.

WW

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:23pm

No harm, it’s yet another example. I disagree with that school too. Although extracurricular activities are voluntary.

WorldWatcher · January 2, 2021, 9:23pm

Actually, in the case that is coming up on the SCOTUS conference - it does.

WW

RTchoke · January 2, 2021, 9:23pm

True.

WuWei · January 2, 2021, 9:24pm

Let’s get back on track then.

WildRose · January 2, 2021, 9:26pm

Citation please, I don’t see it in there.