You arenât a politician who has been calling for violence against law enforcement or one on TV calling that officer a murderer. Do you not understand the implications of what these politicians are doing? They are inciting people to violence to the point of people getting killed. These officers are upholding existing law that was passed by Congress and Lib politicians are justifying them being killed and making heroes and martyrs out of those who try. The politicians goals of hindering Trump succeed but only the citizens are being killed or arrested.
Youâre likely to dismiss any response to thisâŠ
The point is not the physical location where the two events happened. The point is the context of what happened, wherein a person inserted herself into harmâs way. Ms. Good inserted herself in the middle of a LEO operation â armed LEOs â and her behavior raised enough panic in an armed LEO to shoot in self defense.
Iâve always seen the Babbitt shooting in the same way. If it were just a matter of someone being in that building, hundreds of people would have (should have) gotten shot. Babbitt being the first to breach the door raised enough panic in the LEO to shoot.
You heard wrong. She lived there. She had 3 kids, two of which lived with her ex-husband. She had a 6 year old that she was dropping off at a nearby school. She has never, according to her ex, ever been political or attended any kind of rally. She was also a Christian and a poet. Her partner was more interested in politics, she was simply driving the kiddo to school.
And as I said in the ICE thread, it is against DHS policy for an agent to step in front of a moving car. Shooting the driver can injure fellow agents or bystanders.
It is against the general use-of-force policies for a federal agent, including those under the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), to intentionally step in front of a moving vehicle, except in extreme circumstances where the agent or others face an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, and there are no reasonable alternatives available [1].
Federal law enforcement policies, such as those governing Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), classify a moving vehicle as a âdeadly weaponâ when it is being used as such by a subject [1]. Generally, agents are explicitly directed to move out of the path of an approaching vehicle and not to place themselves in a position where a vehicle can be used as a weapon against them [1].
He was to the rear and passenger side of the car when she started to back up and went to the front of the vehicle by the time she went into Drive, against DHS policy. And this is an agent who has already been dragged by another car, so I suppose he didnât learn very much from experience.
Meanwhile that brain dead embarrassment of a governor in Minnesota has no clue when to shut up.
âRepublican lawmakers are urging President Donald Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act against Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz after the Democrat warned he could deploy the National Guard in response to federal immigration enforcement actions in his state.
âInvoke the Insurrection Act. Arrest Tim Walz,â Rep. Mary Miller, R-Ill., said in a post to X on Wednesday evening.
Millerâs calls to apply the law, which gives the president powers to arrest suspects obstructing federal law enforcement, follow Walzâs suggestion that he might deploy the National Guard to push back on President Donald Trumpâs use of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
Well, Walz using the national guard to stop ICE would certainly lead Trump to,at least nationalize the national guardâŠfollowed by some ObamaJudge saying he couldntâŠfollowed by the Supreme Court doing whatever they feel like at the time.