It wasn’t going to the newspapers but rather the commission could check and see how much voter fraud was going on as pertains to illegals in particular.
California didn’t want that for obvious reasons.
It is against the law for California to share that information with the commission, for good reason.
Why is it ok for other people’s private information to be compromised, if you are unwilling to do it yourself?
WuWei
349
True, depending on whose table.
As i said it wasn’t going to the newspapers but rather just so the commission could check.
I would have no problem with the commission checking out my info but will not put it in a public venue for obvious reasons.
Stick with your talking pts and have a nice day though.
It is against the law for California to share that information with the commission.
The commission knew this when they asked.
I suspect they did so specifically to come up with an excuse for the failure of the task force.
I’m fairly certain every state has similar laws - but in this case, California.
California no doubt passed that law for an obvious reason. If indeed such a law even exists.
California is a good state to be FROM. From and not there. 
Every state that I know of has the same law. That’s why every single state refused to hand over the social security numbers attached to voter registrations.
WuWei
357
I agree that voter fraud today is not an issue. I have no sympathy for the “don’t have an ID” argument.
1 Like
My wife just did a bit of googling which said 15 states didn’t not comply with the commissions info requests.
Oddly enough Oregon, even farther left than California, complied.
Of course - your wife did the googling, which means you can’t post a link.
This is what my googling turned up:
But the commission, which is chaired by Vice President Mike Pence, seemed to misunderstand voter privacy laws nationwide. Every state that responded to the commission’s letter said it could not provide Social Security numbers, for example. Others said they consider information such as birth dates and party affiliations to be private.
Hard to say whether it is an issue or not if the proper info to check it out is denied.
I predict if there is a mail in vote there will be major issues.
The information the commission is seeking includes registrants’ full names, addresses, dates of birth, political parties, the last four digits of their social security numbers, a list of the elections they voted in since 2006, information on any felony convictions, information on whether they were registered to vote in other states, their military status, and whether they lived overseas.
The vice chairman’s letter twice requests only “public” voter information, and Kobach clarified the specifics of his request Friday: "Every state receives the same letter, but we’re not asking for it if it’s not publicly available," he told The Kansas City Star.
Pence-Kobach voting commission alarms states with info request
Kobach also told CNN’s Anderson Cooper last week, “Whatever a person on the street can walk in and get, that’s what we would like.”
…
From your own link. So what’s the problem again?
I might add that CNN is hardly a reliable source.
And yet, when states refused to provide information that was not public, Kobach threw up his hands, shut down the whole probe and admitted defeat
I wonder why?
WuWei
364
Government trust: we’ll give our last 4 to the cable company…
Sounds like they didn’t share anything really. If there was no shady voting there wouldn’t be a problem.
Everybody knows it but the left needs those votes.
The end. Period.
Have a blessed day.
1 Like
For some reason you put me in mind of that chess playing pigeon.
I assume you know about that pigeon. 
