162

Obviously, it was not settled law. Now it is. The Federal Government has no Constitutional Authority to mandate to the States how to deal with the issue of Abortion.

2 Likes
163

No, they decided that that is what the Constitution requires. Pretty much all things not protected as individual rights by the US Constitution are up to the States (and their people) to control. If a State wanted to legalize abortion up to the moment of birth, they could … it works both ways. But even Lib utopias like California have shown little interest in going that far. The majority of people in this country approve of the availability first trimester abortions … 13 weeks. Yet the minority who wants “Roe latitude” (viability, ~22 weeks) abortions, fight against that and even against more liberal 15-16 week limits. Go figure. Whatever happened to majority prevails Democracy.

2 Likes
164

The Catholic Church teaches that Catholics in political power must impose Catholic doctrine on Non-Catholics?

Is that really a thing?

165

Another is to keep the Sabbath Holy.

Does the State define what day is the Sabbath and what should happen on that day?

166

All the responses from the left proves the OP, as yours above.

167

I don’t understand your point.

If we are to have the State define and enforce certain definitions of the Ten Commandments in order to be in line with God’s will then whose definition do we use?

Calling Abortion feels good and all that… but in a legal sense as to how the State should act becomes very very messy.

For instance… does the State put women who have had an abortion into jail for murder?

168

Her size of the rally :thinking: …? does that count flies and flees too?

169

Aren’t guns the leading cause of death amongst children though. And I thought children being murdered was your main concern.
Are you saying its ok for women to lose their right because murdering children but guns can’t be controlled with the same premise in mind.

170

That depends on your definition of children. Under thirteen, the major cause of death are accidents. When you include teenagers, the major cause is gunshot. Urban gangs are the major reason for that statistic.

3 Likes
171

Round here the definition of children being murdered by abortion seems to start at the fetus age.
So I guess it would include all those actually living.

172

Wrong end of the spectrum. I was talking about teenagers, not fetuses. Take teenagers, who are the bulk of urban gangs, out of the equation and suddenly guns aren’t so dangerous for children

173

No. With the required number of witnesses, they would be put to death.
Of course, he who can not be named would have to be taken out back and hit with rocks until dead, so one would think the whole push would lose traction.

174

At other people’s financial expense. That’s not charity. It clearly says God knit you in your mothers womb, which clearly means you were a human a conception.

3 Likes
175

This idea that God’s directives can be ignored if you think that it will financially inconvenience another person is just simply amazing.

2 Likes
176

You aren’t doing gods work by making other people pay for what you want under the guise of charity. Unless you Jezcoe have personally taken in a migrant, fed them and clothed them, then you yourself didn’t do what you claim we should do. It’s easy to spend other peoples money instead of yours and call it charity.

2 Likes
177

What I find funny about the idea that a particular political party is representative of God’s will and authority is that it is based on forcing women to carry unwanted pregnancies… a lot of times to the detriment of their own health… but they do not champion a pretty big thing in the Bible of welcoming the stranger and treating the foreigner well because it might inconvenience people.

That is why I call ■■■■■■■■ on the claim that a particular political party is concerned with what God wants.

3 Likes
178

I find it funny liberals want to spend other peoples money and call it personal charity work. FYI Murder is Murder.
Nowhere does it say in the Bible does it say murder is ok as long as a persons life is an inconvenience to you. Look at Jezcoe lecturing us on how to be charitable with migrants when he himself doesn’t do it. And nowhere does it say we must house and clothes serial rapists and murderers, seems libs been lying about Aurora

3 Likes
179

This needs to be repeated over and over again.

5 Likes
180

Slavery was a Democrat position.

What odd is lack of humanity and not a human were the same justifications as they use for abortion.

History and arguments for dehumanization repeat……

5 Likes
181

As opposed to spending billions of other people’s money to keep them out.

Not very in line with welcoming the foreigner.