sure. but this thread isnt about that
start a “how idiotic leftist policies are ruining society and have been for decades” and maybe i’ll chime in with specifics.
nothing like that costs as much as we’ve been funneling to Ukraine
sickening
1 Like
wonder who this perp’s harvested mail in ballot was for
1 Like
start a thread if you really want to know or discuss
tnt
66
You started this thread upset about a mass shooting from Feb. that wasn’t in the headlines.
Am I wrong to assume that you think it should be in the headlines, and should be promoting a discussion about how to prevent them in the future?
i wasnt “upset”
not everyone who starts a thread is “upset” about that topic
yes
tnt
68
We agree that current mental health spending is inadequate, correct?
In 2020, the federal goverment spent 280B on mental health services, and the states spent about another 50B. That’s 330B total. And we agree it’s not doing the job.
We’ve spent about 113B to Ukraine.
tnt
69

thinkingman:
yes
Then why did you say:
just a quick blurb. no big deal. except several kids were shot
no pictures of perp either.
CNN 


because it was just a quick blurb without a mugshot
despite several kids being killed
it was in the headlines.
inadequate in how it is spent. yes
not in amount
problems dont go away just by throwing money at it
(neither do wars. )
Guvnah
72

thinkingman:
all of them
Actually, none of them MADE this guy shoot anyone.
But leftism is a broth of immorality, diminished respect for human lives other than oneself, fatherless kids, loss of civil norms, and a host of other such ills that all swirl together to add to the soup of societal dysfunction we face today.
2 Likes
tnt
73
I’m sorry, but I’ confused.
When you said “no big deal” I thought you were being sarcastic.
No?
tnt
74
I agree. We should be spending it better.
But you see that you were incorrect in claiming we spend more on Ukraine, correct?
no you’re not
you just keep trying to twist the argument around to serve your position
tnt
77
No.
I thought you were upset about this mass shooting, and were expressing disappointment that it was not in the headlines, generating more conversation, and that you wanted to have those conversations to avoid such tragedies in the future.
Sorry if I had that wrong.
What was your intention them?

tnt:
No
yes
of course. you need emotion as a foundation to hijack a thread
i just wondered why we weren’t over this “mass” shooting and why cnn refused to refer to it as such, per their own definition.
please show where i claimed this
lol thats not what that claims
if we could use 1/100th of the amt they sent to ukraine that’d be awesome
if used correctly!
sorry
1 Like