Yes Biden. The second amendment does include AR-15s

[amadeus]

@Samm

@amadeus

For some, even life and death are not cut and dry.

Oh? Is there some other alternative that we don’t know about?

Some people believe in life after death.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

I’m not making up my own definitions… I’m pointing out the lack of a definitive definition.

Did you or did you not define an RPG launch tube as an arm?

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

[Samm]

@amadeus

@Samm

@amadeus

For some, even life and death are not cut and dry.

Oh? Is there some other alternative that we don’t know about?

Some people believe in life after death.

That’s after, not between.

[fallenturtle]

@Samm

@fallenturtle

I’m not making up my own definitions… I’m pointing out the lack of a definitive definition.

Did you or did you not define an RPG launch tube as an arm?

I’m not making up my own definitions, I’m using Black’s Law’s definition:
“Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at or strike at another.”

This is the definition I’ll continue to use until someone links to a more appropriate one.

[fallenturtle]

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

Again? The first time would be fine. I’ve searched this thread and have not found this from you and I’m not going to work my way through your post history.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

I’m not making up my own definitions… I’m pointing out the lack of a definitive definition.

Did you or did you not define an RPG launch tube as an arm?

I’m not making up my own definitions, I’m using Black’s Law’s definition:
“Anything that a man wears for his defense, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at or strike at another.”

This is the definition I’ll continue to use until someone links to a more appropriate one.

No … you are interpreting that definition to suit your purposes.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

Again? The first time would be fine. I’ve searched this thread and have not found this from you and I’m not going to work my way through your post history.

It’s not my problem to keep you up to date on my former posts.

[fallenturtle]

Odd, that appears to be what you’re doing.

[fallenturtle]

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

Again? The first time would be fine. I’ve searched this thread and have not found this from you and I’m not going to work my way through your post history.

It’s not my problem to keep you up to date on my former posts.

I don’t know why you bother to argue with me when you can’t even back your own ■■■■ up with a source. I’ve provided a definition from a law dictionary.

[fallenturtle]

Not so cut and dry:

“Obviously the Amendment does not apply to arms that cannot be hand-carried — it’s to keep and “bear,” so it doesn’t apply to cannons — but I suppose here are hand-held rocket launchers that can bring down airplanes, that will have to be decided.” -Scalia

[Striker840]

@altair1013

@fallenturtle

That’s going to take forever and a lot of bullets.

I’m a damned good shot. Double award expert. USMC.

Yea, how much did you pay the dude in the butts?
Lol

[fallenturtle]

@Striker840

@altair1013

@fallenturtle

That’s going to take forever and a lot of bullets.

I’m a damned good shot. Double award expert. USMC.

Yea, how much did you pay the dude in the butts?
Lol

“not that there’s anything wrong with that”

[Striker840]

@fallenturtle

@Striker840

@altair1013

@fallenturtle

That’s going to take forever and a lot of bullets.

I’m a damned good shot. Double award expert. USMC.

Yea, how much did you pay the dude in the butts?
Lol

“not that there’s anything wrong with that”

Pulling and marking the target
In the USMC those who are pulling and marking the targets are working the butts. Nice of you to add/assume a meaning here.

[fallenturtle]

@Striker840

@fallenturtle

@Striker840

@altair1013

@fallenturtle

That’s going to take forever and a lot of bullets.

I’m a damned good shot. Double award expert. USMC.

Yea, how much did you pay the dude in the butts?
Lol

“not that there’s anything wrong with that”

Pulling and marking the target
In the USMC those who are pulling and marking the targets are working the butts. Nice of you to add/assume a meaning here.

I assumed it was USMC jargon I was unfamiliar with… I was just making a joke, lighten up.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

Odd, that appears to be what you’re doing.

My interpretation of the definition is the same as it has been for 230 years. In other words, it’s not my definition, it is the definition.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

Again? The first time would be fine. I’ve searched this thread and have not found this from you and I’m not going to work my way through your post history.

It’s not my problem to keep you up to date on my former posts.

I don’t know why you bother to argue with me when you can’t even back your own ■■■■ up with a source. I’ve provided a definition from a law dictionary.

What I don’t bother to do is to keep you supplied with the same source over and over each time you ask for it.

[Samm]

@fallenturtle

Not so cut and dry:

“Obviously the Amendment does not apply to arms that cannot be hand-carried — it’s to keep and “bear,” so it doesn’t apply to cannons — but I suppose here are hand-held rocket launchers that can bring down airplanes, that will have to be decided.” -Scalia

And what did he decide?

[fallenturtle]

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Odd, that appears to be what you’re doing.

My interpretation of the definition is the same as it has been for 230 years. In other words, it’s not my definition, it is the definition.

Your definition isn’t even documented. The definition I’ve been using, from Black’s Law, is.

[fallenturtle]

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

@Samm

@fallenturtle

Duck duck go also didn’t come up with any results. So where did that sentence come from?

It’s a paraphrasing from the 18th Century definition used by the Framers.

I haven’t see that one… seems to be missing context. Who’s doing the issuing?

Are you ever going to show where the “military definition” is documented?

No. Not again.

Again? The first time would be fine. I’ve searched this thread and have not found this from you and I’m not going to work my way through your post history.

It’s not my problem to keep you up to date on my former posts.

I don’t know why you bother to argue with me when you can’t even back your own ■■■■ up with a source. I’ve provided a definition from a law dictionary.

What I don’t bother to do is to keep you supplied with the same source over and over each time you ask for it.

You never gave it to me in the first place.