This is funny.

What do you think happens when CEOs whose companies are performing poorly finally get “sacked” (a process that usually takes a while)?

It’s absolutely not the same thing that would happen if you got sacked for poor performance.

In this world, I don’t have to look far…to see an ass. It’s a target rich environment.

Women didn’t go to work because of “feminazis”.

Exactly, which is why I want my daughter to make something of herself before she decides to get married.

Divorce…when the children are young, has a negative impact on their maturing into adulthood, often lacking the sense of balance they get from the male and female perspective of their parents.

Agreed my friend. A happy marriage is often a merger of two, that The Lord makes one.

1 Like

Divorce isn’t the main reason, either.

“negative impact” and…yes it does.

I didn’t say it had no impact.

I said it wasn’t the main driver for women in the workforce.

Nor were “feminazis”.

Nor was any other social issue you want to cite next.

The main driver was economic.

Which is by and large the main driver for any large scale change of this nature.

In fact…a large portion of the economic growth this nation has enjoyed over the past 30 years would not have happened without women joining the workforce.

If more people understood the economy is a virtuous cycle they’d understand this.

Why would a CEO who is already sitting on millions get off the beach and go to work for peanuts? The reason CEO pay is so high is because the people who can do the job well are generally very connected and wealthy people to begin with. I know a CEO who has been trying to retire and enjoy his wealth for decades, the problem is, every time he finishes a job and tries to go back to his ranch, someone knocks on his door and offers him boat loads of cash to come out of retirement, just one more time.

2 Likes

You think it’s because people who could be CEOs are in short supply?

:roll_eyes:

Sigh…this phenomenon happens for the same reason coaches get recycled in the NFL.

Yes, I know people who can be good CEO’s are in short supply. Why, do you think businesses just generally like giving money away for no reason?

2 Likes

wants vs needs

So many have a hard time denying their wants, in satisfying their needs. It’s all about choices my friend.

2 Likes

Yep, reminds me of the posters who moan about how workers in the sixties and seventies could survive on one income. Sure they could, but it was in tiny houses with one car. I have a garage out back bigger than the house my father owned on his sixties era auto factory job.

3 Likes

No- the main driver was economic.

Your wants v needs is an irrelevant addition of your own personal value judgement.

People act the way people act.

I always found this curious tension of value judgements that “people should be concerned only for their needs” v “you can’t tax the wealthy. It will make them stop trying to get ahead” that exists within many conservatives to be fascinating.

Especially, of course, as to how the tension is resolved compartmentalization and applying these competing notions to different groups.

I thought you’d like it.

It’s not the same humans.

You are mis-identifying the problem.

I agree with that.

1 Like

Will you ever make one million dollars a year?

I know.

That’s the problem.

As soon as enough time has passed, the lessons learned in the past aren’t maintained.

Way our species has evolved.

Immediate environment and time is the end all be all. For all intents and purposes, the past and future don’t exist and are irrelevant.