Indeed I did and you have a long history of attributing things to people they never said.

What did Samm day then?

You have a long history have being inaccurate, prove me wrong

You made the claim it’s up to you to support it.

What did Samm say? I already made my point

Here I’ll help you, just to save several post of you goalpost moving

Any questions?

Well I’d ask why you are trying so hard to twist his words into something he never said but as I mentioned, you have a long history of doing just that.

Show me what I am twisting… if I actually was you would have already pointed out exactly what it was

Did Samm say this, yes or no?

Medicare for All Would Abolish Private Insurance. ā€˜There’s No Precedent in American History.’

Why do you persist in this nonsense? Are you seriously that out of touch or are you just playing mind games? :roll_eyes:

What exactly is your point? I’ve made mine very succinctly but you seem to be intent on playing silly games. State your point or I’m moving on.

Yes but he didn’t say: if the majority wants it then according to you it isn’t socialism

You see the difference? You took Samm’s words and twisted them. Anyone can plainly see that is the case. Please stop wasting everyone’s time with your silly game.

My point is… public schools are government funded. The government is funded through TAXES from THE PEOPLE.

Public schools provide a SERVICE that produces Schools, pays administrators and deliver curriculum. That service is paid by state and federal taxes.

How is that not socialism?

( snort )

The federal government doesn’t own or control the means of production, thus it isn’t socialism. Pretty straightforward stuff. :wink:

Who owns the means of production for public schools? Private companies?

Already been answered. Public schools are a service administered by local school districts. There are plenty of available alternatives. Taxpayer funding is not the definition of socialism. I believe we are done with this topic.

Who pays them?

So what? So you would be ok with Medicare for all, as a socialist program, so long as there are alternatives?

How is the government funded?

Ahhh I miss this from you. Welcome back

As proposed, Medicare for all is single payer, no alternatives.

Like private schools, I believe Religions organizations will stand up their own health insurance alternatives. The government can’t stop that.

Police Departments? Firefighters? Are their alternatives for those?

Local governments provide taxpayer funded services. That isn’t socialism. Again I have to ask about your agenda?? :confused:

What is it about republican forms of gov that forbids making an industry within a state publicly owned and operated?

Cut the crap. :roll_eyes: