Would the Brittney Griner's and Megan Rapinoe's of the world support ending "women's" sports in favor of A & B Leagues?

Especially in light of the view that it is simply impossible to define a woman. Also, to do this for all sports at all levels. Simply state that no homosapiens who qualify to play in the A league of a sport can play in the B league of that sport.

Most sports should just move to a three-tier system: a men’s league, a women’s league, and a league for anyone (no gender identification required).

1 Like

Nobody is interested in the Tranny League, and everyone knows it. Even the transgender people won’t watch it.

WNBA, anyone? :rofl:

4 Likes

A tranny will never play in the WNBA and a female will never play in the NBA.
These people are not just morons, they’re full of ■■■■■

3 Likes

But if the sports leagues cannot define exactly what is a man and what is a woman, how exactly can there be leagues for such entities?

1 Like

Y’all really hung up on this.

1 Like

It could be something like this:

2 Likes

Kinda crazy isn’t it?

They’re going to spend how much of the taxpayers money?
Loudon county schools. Isn’t that where they hid a rapist who “identified” as a female across two schools?
What could go wrong huh? 18 & possibly 19 year old men sharing bathrooms with 13 & 14 year old girls.
You people are â– â– â– â– â– â– â–  crazy and promoting pedophilia!

There are a thousand arguments against this including the tax payer one that is in your post.

Calling 18 yo boys “men” and then their attraction to freshmen girls pedophilia has got to be the weakest of them all.

That’s like arguing that Romeo and Juliet laws promote pedophilia.

1 Like

That won’t cut it with transgenders. They’re selling you on their fact that they’re women…not “anyone”. It’s a nice thought but there’d have to be some sanity for this to work…and that’s lacking these days… …:sunglasses: :tumbler_glass:

1 Like

18 year old “boys” are legal adults.
Exposing them to minor age girls with perhaps an opportunity for rape ( can’t call it consensual), isn’t promoting pedophilia?
I’d like to hear you argue that in a courtroom.
But are your “thousand arguments against” directed at shooting this madness down?
And who will be funding this folly if not the taxpayers?

Your legal system does. So does my war department.

1 Like

Yep, suits would abound. Separate but equal also.

I wish we would quit watering down this word. An 18-year-old man hooking up with a 15-year-old girl may be statutory rape, but it certainly isn’t pedophilia.

2 Likes

The argument was already made. They are called Romeo and Juliet laws. They exist in many estates including red ones. Nobody is calling a 19 yo dating a 16 yo a pedo. Stop.

Agreed. It’s the wrong word anyway. The correct terms are ephebophilia for late adolescents (such as the example) and hebephilia for early pubescents (11-14).

1 Like

Never even heard of those words. Guess I learned something today!

2 Likes

Ok the they’re creating an environment for minor girls to be rape victims.
Feel better?

Sure, anyone who rapes should forfeit life.

1 Like

I don’t think those are applicable either because those are paraphilic and primary. Meaning their primary target of attraction are those age groups. But i not a psychologist so i am not sure.