Especially in light of the view that it is simply impossible to define a woman. Also, to do this for all sports at all levels. Simply state that no homosapiens who qualify to play in the A league of a sport can play in the B league of that sport.
Most sports should just move to a three-tier system: a men’s league, a women’s league, and a league for anyone (no gender identification required).
They’re going to spend how much of the taxpayers money?
Loudon county schools. Isn’t that where they hid a rapist who “identified” as a female across two schools?
What could go wrong huh? 18 & possibly 19 year old men sharing bathrooms with 13 & 14 year old girls.
You people are â– â– â– â– â– â– â– crazy and promoting pedophilia!
That won’t cut it with transgenders. They’re selling you on their fact that they’re women…not “anyone”. It’s a nice thought but there’d have to be some sanity for this to work…and that’s lacking these days… …
18 year old “boys” are legal adults.
Exposing them to minor age girls with perhaps an opportunity for rape ( can’t call it consensual), isn’t promoting pedophilia?
I’d like to hear you argue that in a courtroom.
But are your “thousand arguments against” directed at shooting this madness down?
And who will be funding this folly if not the taxpayers?
I wish we would quit watering down this word. An 18-year-old man hooking up with a 15-year-old girl may be statutory rape, but it certainly isn’t pedophilia.
The argument was already made. They are called Romeo and Juliet laws. They exist in many estates including red ones. Nobody is calling a 19 yo dating a 16 yo a pedo. Stop.
Agreed. It’s the wrong word anyway. The correct terms are ephebophilia for late adolescents (such as the example) and hebephilia for early pubescents (11-14).
I don’t think those are applicable either because those are paraphilic and primary. Meaning their primary target of attraction are those age groups. But i not a psychologist so i am not sure.