^ Trolling on display.
I mean…since this is in the political column, eh? If she votes D then in your crib, libs are bad?
The term “mass shooting” is poorly defined, though. The FBI doesn’t even use that term, they use “active shooter” in which
‘an individual actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a confined and populated area."
Some people say its 4 deaths to make it a mass shooting, and some say 4 injuries. Neither definition is settled, though.
Most of the hair splitting is pointless though, gun control advocates favor a lax definition and gun advocates favor a more strict one.
Dem won’t run on ending your 2nd A rights, but we know they will at the drop of a hat. They lie to get elected.
1 Like
Both sides play that game depending on which side it makes look bad…concerning shootings, and in general.
Come on man. 10 people getting shot isn’t a mass shooting.
1 Like
You probably thought that made sense when you typed it. You should try again.
Quiero decir… ya que esto está en la columna política, ¿EH? Si ella vota D en tu cuna, ¿las bibliotecas son malas?
Violating the TOS doesn’t improve it any.
Which doesn’t negate the ignorance on display.
And here you are in full regalia.
Which STILL doesn’t negate the ignorance on display.
You never fail to disappoint. 
Which STILL doesn’t negate your ignorance on display.
Why don’t you tell me what it is that you think that I don’t know instead of beating your drum like the energizer bunny? How will I ever be educated if you don’t teach me?
Need more Ice Cream so when someone goes bananas they can make a case for why need more Ice Cream to protect ourselves from bananas with Ice Cream.
1 Like
Finally, an argument from you I can agree with.
You don’t believe that guns kill people so why bother.
That right there proves that you have nothing to teach me or anyone else on this topic. But thanks for trying.
What part of “it’s a terrible situation to be sure” are you not understanding?
