let me know when the jockey can carry the horse at 30 mph.

for the jockey, its a test of skill, the physical test is for the horse.

It’s a team effort - by both jockey and horse.

who said it wasn’t?

Don’t get me started on that. Working from home has resulted in me watching too many daytime talk shows. Do you know there are many men who have fathered 10 kids or more?? And by multiple women. It is sickening.

Another ill informed person on horse racing.

Allan

genetic diversity. doing their part to ensure the survival of the species!

yes, i’m joking

That is quite subjective. Strength and speed may favor men, but endurance are pretty equal. Specific skillset, are also quite equal ie putting.

Having the ability to give birth tilts the advantage to women…IMO.

yeah, because people started riding horses so they could be even more tired after traveling 20 miles.

it takes skill to ride a horse, not physical strength or endurance. the physical part the horse does

i believe endurance tilts to women.

And here’s the foolishness of feminism, trying to convince the rest of the world that the consequences are equal for men and women when it comes to the same action.

Here’s anatomy and physiology one, with some math on the side. Historically women having more partners have been “shamed” because their only possibility is one child of unknown or disputed paternity.

When men have more than one wife, they can father many children. Polygamy—traditional marriage offers—fathers and extended family providing for the children.

Mathematically, there exist more methods of birth control developed for women. Why instead of taking advantage of them are they making babies with men who aren’t going to stick around, already have children elsewhere

No it isn’t.

In the absence of polygamy, having multiple partners should be shamed, for both men and women.

Human beings aren’t supposed to conduct themselves like cats, for whom multiple tomcats sire their litters, and generally leave.

The cat is conducting itself by instinct. Human beings have a choice.

I don’t think this is at all distasteful.

disgraceful is more like it. who are they to judge female students appropriateness? in this case, they chose the wrong battle to fight here. the pictures i saw where quite tame. i have seen more skin at a church function.

Yes…

They are children. Seems appropriate for adults to judge their appropriateness.

Because boys will be boys and will gawk and get distracted… ridiculous

No, because responsible adults don’t allow children to be sexualized. What is the purpose of showing cleavage? To arouse sexual interest. Children have no business having sex.

It’s a personal choice. The purpose of showing cleavage has also to do with self confidence and body image. The sexualization of the choice is sure as heck from the adults. That’s for sure.

There is absolutely nothing sexual about that picture.

1 Like