With victory in Nevada, Democrats hold the Senate

[Smyrna]

@WorldWatcher

No I wasn’t there.

However there was a non affiliated inspector there, an Election Supervisor, video footage, and an investigation done by Gabriel Sterling the Republican Chief Operating Officer in the Office of the Georgia Secretary of State debunked the claim.

Oh, you think because someone writes what they believe in an affidavit that it is true? Isn’t that special.

WW

@Smyrna

Let’s just say, we disagree on this. Hopefully one day…one of us will be proven right and I hope it’s you. If it’s me, “we” are all in trouble?

…

[WorldWatcher]

@Smyrna

@WorldWatcher

No I wasn’t there.

However there was a non affiliated inspector there, an Election Supervisor, video footage, and an investigation done by Gabriel Sterling the Republican Chief Operating Officer in the Office of the Georgia Secretary of State debunked the claim.

Oh, you think because someone writes what they believe in an affidavit that it is true? Isn’t that special.

WW

@Smyrna

Let’s just say, we disagree on this. Hopefully one day…one of us will be proven right and I hope it’s you. If it’s me, “we” are all in trouble?

…

Republicans in Georgia already proved the claims were wrong and debunked the claims.

WW

[Smyrna]

@WorldWatcher

Republicans in Georgia already proved the claims were wrong and debunked the claims.

WW

No…they did not and I’m not going round and round with sheople food.

[WorldWatcher]

@Smyrna

@WorldWatcher

Republicans in Georgia already proved the claims were wrong and debunked the claims.

WW

No…they did not and I’m not going round and round with sheople food.

Ya, they did. I posted the video of Gabriel Sterling the Republican Chief Operating Officer in the Office of the Georgia Secretary of State who investigated and debunked the claim addressing the various claims about the State Farm Center.

It was a YouTube video so I thought you would have seen it.

WW

[JayJay]

Restveasy.

We have been proven right.

[WuWei]

@Smyrna

@WuWei

Georgia reublicans colluded with democrats to hand the state over?

Keep something in mind Sneaky…there is a corrupt, political establishment on both sides of the aisle who gain millions and millions by keeping the status quo. Trump disrupted that…and the unity on both sides of the aisle, combined with the majority of the MSM and our trusted intelligence agencies…ALL worked to insure Trump would NEVER enter the WH again.

Yes then?

[SpadeMarlowe]

Before they started this new practice elections vere finished pronto and results known by midnight.
Plus in all those cases where they cheat the R wins and then paper votes rolled in after midnight change results.
Ill never forget a truck load of paper ballots with 400 000 balots rolled in at 04 AM and ALL were for Biden. One needs be no Aeinstain to see the obvious.
Same happened this time with Cortez in Nevada. She was losing till truck rolled in 20 000 votes next day and ALL for her.

[WorldWatcher]

@SpadeMarlowe

Before they started this new practice elections vere finished pronto and results known by midnight.

This is a factually incorrect statement if it applies to vote counting.

Again another poster doesn’t understand that what is announced on election night are media projections not official certifications of the election. Final certification takes days and sometimes weeks.

As an example did you know there are certain mail-in ballots in Florida that can be received up to 10 days AFTER election day to be considered valid and counted? So in Florida, it takes at least 10 days to have a final count.

WW

[Smyrna]

@WorldWatcher

This is a factually incorrect statement if it applies to vote counting.

Uh, huh…and even with the technology of 1948…that election was determined when people woke up the next morning and that was over 7 decades ago. There is NO EXCUSE!

[bigtwnvin]

@WorldWatcher

Once those factors are known then it becomes a mathematical process to achieve the results and the willingness to fund the infrastructure and shape the laws to allow it to happen.

Yup, shaping Dem laws

[WorldWatcher]

@bigtwnvin

@WorldWatcher

Once those factors are known then it becomes a mathematical process to achieve the results and the willingness to fund the infrastructure and shape the laws to allow it to happen.

Yup, shaping Dem laws

In PA The GOP voted for Act 77.

Then after the election turned around and sued to challenge a law the past.

WW

[Publius]

Cool stories, bro! Links?

[Publius]

@WorldWatcher

@SpadeMarlowe

Before they started this new practice elections vere finished pronto and results known by midnight.

This is a factually incorrect statement if it applies to vote counting.

Again another poster doesn’t understand that what is announced on election night are media projections not official certifications of the election. Final certification takes days and sometimes weeks.

As an example did you know there are certain mail-in ballots in Florida that can be received up to 10 days AFTER election day to be considered valid and counted? So in Florida, it takes at least 10 days to have a final count.

WW

Some races in CA were still at 40% or so yesterday - mail ballots.

And those early projections back in the old days were often based on exit polling vs actual ballot numbers, until they seem to have figured out that exit polling isn’t very reliable.

[WorldWatcher]

@Publius

@WorldWatcher

@SpadeMarlowe

Before they started this new practice elections vere finished pronto and results known by midnight.

This is a factually incorrect statement if it applies to vote counting.

Again another poster doesn’t understand that what is announced on election night are media projections not official certifications of the election. Final certification takes days and sometimes weeks.

As an example did you know there are certain mail-in ballots in Florida that can be received up to 10 days AFTER election day to be considered valid and counted? So in Florida, it takes at least 10 days to have a final count.

WW

Some races in CA were still at 40% or so yesterday - mail ballots.

And those early projections back in the old days were often based on exit polling vs actual ballot numbers, until they seem to have figured out that exit polling isn’t very reliable.

Yep.

I can’t remember, methods changed in the 90’s or early 2000’s when the media realized they were getting it wrong.

About the same time after when they stopped reporting projections and vote counts until the polls closed.

WW

[SpadeMarlowe]

I am talking about rules that were changed by Democrats during Pandemic. Last 2 elections and what changed.
Very convinient to benefit only them with these paper ballots delivered days after election.
400 000 paper ones all for Biden unloaded at 04 AM.
That wasnt anything to do with Media or 90 or 2000 year elections.
I knew something was rotten in Denmark when Pelosi said 1 week before the big date: “No matter what happens in the election Biden will be President”
How did she know that!

[Publius]

@SpadeMarlowe

I am talking about rules that were changed by Democrats during Pandemic. Last 2 elections and what changed.
Very convinient to benefit only them with these paper ballots delivered days after election.
400 000 paper ones all for Biden unloaded at 04 AM.
That wasnt anything to do with Media or 90 or 2000 year elections.
I knew something was rotten in Denmark when Pelosi said 1 week before the big date: “No matter what happens in the election Biden will be President”
How did she know that!

Please provide some substantiation of “400,000 votes all for Biden,” and then we can talk.

[SpadeMarlowe]

It was on the news every day after election. Look it up, you’re younger and smarter and faster at it. Where did I get it if not from daily pounding of same story.
You’re not saying I made it up, do you?

[WorldWatcher]

@SpadeMarlowe

It was on the news every day after election. Look it up, you’re younger and smarter and faster at it. Where did I get it if not from daily pounding of same story.
You’re not saying I made it up, do you?

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-wi-pa-mi-vote-spikes/fact-check-vote-spikes-in-wisconsin-michigan-and-pennsylvania-do-not-prove-election-fraud-idUSKBN27Q307

Here it is…

WW

[Publius]

@SpadeMarlowe

It was on the news every day after election. Look it up, you’re younger and smarter and faster at it. Where did I get it if not from daily pounding of same story.
You’re not saying I made it up, do you?

No, of course not. But I might suggest you look outside randos on social media for your “reporting.”

[SpadeMarlowe]

Thank you.
How do you prove those were ALL legit votes.
Especially when they all helped Ds only.
My point is we had no doubt or obvious cheating taking place till they started this new routine.
If we all stood in line with ID in hand ON the election day this wouldn’t happen.
No wonder Ds fight tooth and nail against it.
My point is this: Remove questionable practices and hard to verify ways and we’ll have no problems.