Will the Chief Justice even show up?

[TheDoctorIsIn]

@WuWei

Yes. To a point.

That argument works during an election - maybe. Lesser of two evils, and all that.

Not so much right now.

[PurpnGold]

@altair1013

Why is it that every time I ask to see this so called “good explanation,” libs refuse to offer it. Or claim I already saw it. Which I did not.

Georgia did 3 hand count audits…

Three!

What more do you want?

[altair1013]

@zantax

Obama never suggested anyone break the law.

Shall I continue?

Remember the IRS targeting scandal? No one ever got punished for it (washingtonexaminer.com)

[zantax]

@altair1013

@zantax

Obama never suggested anyone break the law.

Shall I continue?

Remember the IRS targeting scandal? No one ever got punished for it (washingtonexaminer.com)

Speaking in the context of riots.

[altair1013]

@PurpnGold

Georgia did 3 hand count audits…

Three!

What more do you want?

Why they kicked everyone out of the polling station in Georgia, pulled boxes out from under tables and loaded them into voting machines. I would like to hear from the people who did it.

That’s all I want.

[WuWei]

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

@WuWei

@zantax

And the democrats narrative of a systemically racist country with a systemically racist justice system? When do they go down for incitement?

Later. Slavery and Jim Crow bought slack.

Well that’s a new concept, what she we call it, incitement reparations? I didn’t realize all democrats were black even.

Did you not accuse Obama of incitement?

In a moral sense, not a legal one. Saying something that makes people mad enough to riot is not by itself a crime. Obama never suggested anyone break the law.

He didn’t? "We bring a gun…folks in Philly like a good brawl…?

Saying something that makes people mad enough to riot is not by itself a crime.

It’s not? Are you sure? Encourage, breach the peace…

[Guntsu]

I understood the initial support for Trump, Republicans convinced themselves that they needed an “outsider” to really champion their causes ok fine…

But the constant lies, gas-lighting and conspiracy peddling…Trump went full AM radio and in the final days he took it a step too far…although I will say for now… who knows what Trumps political fortunes will be

[WuWei]

If you want to impeach, you have to win the House.

[Snow96]

@sikofit

The Constitution. It’s not his decision to make

OH really?

how many judges have IGNORED this part of the same constitution?

shall not be infringed.

[WuWei]

@TheDoctorIsIn

@WuWei

Yes. To a point.

That argument works during an election - maybe. Lesser of two evils, and all that.

Not so much right now.

You make my point. Trump passed that point.

[TommyLucchese]

@altair1013

Why they kicked everyone out of the polling station in Georgia, pulled boxes out from under tables and loaded them into voting machines. I would like to hear from the people who did it.

That’s all I want.

Did that even happen?

[Meriweather]

@TheDoctorIsIn

So?

Is that itself a reason to support Donald Trump? That his enemies are “bad”?

His enemies have been corrupt.
In any case, I do appreciate the exchange of views this morning. I do want to note is that President Trump has said he is now working on a peaceful transfer of power. It appears the Democrats themselves are not very concerned that there pursuit of Impeachment will delay confirmation for the next Administration. Which one is better for the nation?

Anyway, I always watch myself for signs of boredom, because when I find myself growing bored, I know I am boring others. My apologies for that, and also my sincere wishes you do not regret the next Administration. (And I mean to all who have been posting with me, not just TheDoctor.)

[DougBH]

@Meriweather

@WuWei

Prevent Donald J. Trump from ever holding national office again.

To quote an earlier post the wording in which I disagreed:

Let the voters decide. Easy peasy.

To convict after he is out of office would only be of significance in preventing him from running again. It is the Senate saying “we are afraid that the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”. That would be as great a threat to democracy as anything Trump has done.

[WuWei]

@DougBH

@Meriweather

@WuWei

Prevent Donald J. Trump from ever holding national office again.

To quote an earlier post the wording in which I disagreed:

Let the voters decide. Easy peasy.

To convict after he is out of office would only be of significance in preventing him from running again. It is the Senate saying “we are afraid that the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”. That would be as great a threat to democracy as anything Trump has done.

Trump never won the popular vote. The majority of people didn’t want him. Either time.

[zantax]

@WuWei

@DougBH

@Meriweather

@WuWei

Prevent Donald J. Trump from ever holding national office again.

To quote an earlier post the wording in which I disagreed:

Let the voters decide. Easy peasy.

To convict after he is out of office would only be of significance in preventing him from running again. It is the Senate saying “we are afraid that the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”. That would be as great a threat to democracy as anything Trump has done.

Trump never won the popular vote. The majority of people didn’t want him. Either time.

Irrelevant.

[DougBH]

@WuWei

@DougBH

@Meriweather

@WuWei

Prevent Donald J. Trump from ever holding national office again.

To quote an earlier post the wording in which I disagreed:

Let the voters decide. Easy peasy.

To convict after he is out of office would only be of significance in preventing him from running again. It is the Senate saying “we are afraid that the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”. That would be as great a threat to democracy as anything Trump has done.

Trump never won the popular vote. The majority of people didn’t want him. Either time.

Then anti republican. Not allowing the Constitutional voting process to decide.

[WuWei]

@zantax

@WuWei

@DougBH

@Meriweather

@WuWei

Prevent Donald J. Trump from ever holding national office again.

To quote an earlier post the wording in which I disagreed:

Let the voters decide. Easy peasy.

To convict after he is out of office would only be of significance in preventing him from running again. It is the Senate saying “we are afraid that the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”. That would be as great a threat to democracy as anything Trump has done.

Trump never won the popular vote. The majority of people didn’t want him. Either time.

Irrelevant.

It is when one claims “the majority of the people may want Trump, and we cannot allow the will of the people”.

[WuWei]

Ok…

[DougBH]

Just politically, I am surprised Democrats would push this. A continued Trump is much more dangerous to the Republican party’s chances in the future than to the Democrat’s chances in the future.
Though I am not convinced that impeachment by itself would prevent Trump from having a good deal of influence over the Republican party.
But then, Pelosi has an almost visible aura of “hate Trump” around her (though I’m sure she prays for him regularly like she claims)

[Snow96]

@WuWei

Trump never won the popular vote. The majority of people didn’t want him. Either time.

Will of the people in 2016 was that he get enough of the electoral college to win the election. The presise stands that Trump scares liberals enough that they can’t take that chance again in 2024. They need to ban him from running entirely.