Jezcoe
81
The people who did that were being dumb.
That is perfectly legal if the State chooses to do that.
I love it when there has to be a stretch to make false equivalence whataboutism.
We saw a preview over the summer We know how far the dimocrats were willing to go.
Thatās why they kept pretending the Republicans were the violent ones.
1 Like
ā(D)umbā? Why not insurrectionist?
Jezcoe
85
Because random people thing on the internet is not the same as the President of the United States building a faulty legal case, using the power of his office, and mounting a nationwwide pressure campaign to get people to change the results of the election that he lost.
Until one can understand that people arguing in passing that the electors⦠who at the time in 2016 were not under legal obligation but they now are⦠should vote differently than their pledge⦠something that was not going to happen⦠than Trump team going as far as set up alternate slates of electors to create the illusion that there was indeed a conflict when there was none outside of their imaginations⦠if the difference canāt be understood then I have no more to say.
his move does nothing but expose the house even more for the partisan narrative driven swamp that it is. each party driving a party populist theme through narratives that are exclusive to their membership and meant to exclude any possibility of compromise through strict adherence to the narrative messaging. governance requires at least a small bit of pragmatism. neither side displays any in the house.