johnwk2
645
And they certainly will get what they have voted for, just like the dumbasses in every democrat-controlled city where the democrat leadership is soft on crime and voters get what they have voted for.
So, suck it up New Yorkers I closed my businesses and left NYC long ago.
JWK
Why is NYC’s Democrat Party Leadership filling scarce public housing with illegal aliens when America’s needy Citizens, including U.S. Military Veterans, are going homeless?
Hey John, the final answer to the question posed in this thread:
Will AOC agree to two debates with Tina Forte, her Republican Challenger for NY’s 14th Cong. District?
No. She has no reason to platform her opponent.
District 14
72% reporting
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
Democratic Party
70.6%
78,788 votes
Tina Forte
Republican Party
27.5%
30,661 votes
1 Like
Publius
647
And yet AOC still lives rent-free in your head.
So in the end as your data astutely points out, the New Yorkers who voted to re-elect AOC, apparently are happy with the representation they’ve had.
New Yorkers, resilient?
Or just ■■■■■■■ stupid as all hell?
Yeah, I am totally gonna buy a study from an outfit named “restoring America”. 
Besides, AOC has no responsibility for local matters.
Finally, yes: New Yorkers are resilient.
She is a federal representative….
She was also a federal representative when New York had record low crime rates
johnwk2
651
The latter!
I kind of remember a New Yorker being asked why they voted for De Blasio. The answer was, isn’t he the democrat?
JWK
What will it take for American citizens and their families to realize their homeland is under attack?
johnwk2
653
She was elected and conned the people into accepting her dangerous and un-American policies, especially her soft on crime ■■■■■
1 Like
So they are content with escalating crime. Fascinating.
Camp
655
Hopefully Tina will give it another run in 2024.
She could do lot of CEC spots and build her local name recognition.
johnwk2
656
Only the ■■■■■■■ stupid ones, not NYC’s victims:
JWK
“We often give enemies the means of our own destruction.” – Aesop.
Her soft on crime ■■■■ doesn’t affect New Yorkers… because civics.
Nemesis
659
She is only interested in building her socia media presence and getting those sweet sweet cameo sales. Though I am sure an Only Fans site is next for her.
1 Like
johnwk2
660
Soft on crime ■■■■■ doesn’t affect New Yorkers?
Seems like you . . .
.
You missed a pronoun there? On purpose? Or nah?
johnwk2
663
What I didn’t miss is the fact that she promotes soft on crime crap and other dangerous un-American crap:
She can promote whatever she wants. Her policies have no effect on New York. She hasn’t signed her name on or voted on any bill that effected the crime spike in ny in either direction.
