222

Why do you eat from the trough my friend? Why do you let yourself be used? That isn’t what happened? It’s what you were fed. A better question to ask yourself is why were the windows all boarded up? Allow me to help;

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/fire-set-at-historic-st-johns-church-during-protests-of-george-floyds-death/2020/06/01/4b5c4004-a3b6-11ea-b619-3f9133bbb482_story.html

223

So, you didn’t even bother to read the article you cited did you?

Let’s start with the fact nobody was driven from the church by police of Secret Service and throughout the day long before 6 o’clock the Secret Service and Park Policed had told the protesters the were going to expand the perimeter around the WH over security concerns.

When they attempted to do so protesters started pushing back and that’s when tear gas was used.

1 Like
224

Well that certainly isn’t true.

Institutions without people cannot do anything at all.

Rules, Regulations, and laws cannot enforce themselves and from the lowest guy/gal on the totem pole to the heads of these institutions personal judgement is exercised at every step of the way when making decisions as to how to act while running those institutions.

225

Not exactly shocking that leftists who have tried to drive religion into the closet for decades are trashing The President who has done more to protect religious liberty than any other in many decades in order to villify him.

226

So the archbishop of DC, who made this statement, is a radical leftist who has been driving religion into the closest because he disagrees with a Johnny come lately politician trying to Shaw up his base?

227

You don’t know much about the Episcopal Church do you?

They’ve thrown out the bible to embrace just about every sin democrats endorse.

2 Likes
228

Well…I guess the truth is, after burning the church…those same protestors went across the street, held hands and began singing kumbaya and that’s what the priest was attempting to relate? :sunglasses:

The priest is turning the other cheek, as it is written…I’m choosing not to. The point is, you didn’t hear and acknowledge the first SLAP the protestors gave him across his face, now did you? You chose to ignore that? Now ask yourself why that is?

1 Like
229

Thank you for that wonderful insight that I did not contradict in any way.

230

My entire post completely refutes your asinine conjecture.

231

Your asinine response says nothing to the contrary of what I said.

232

Actually, to some degree he is.

233

i am just a bog standard protestant i am afraid.

234

You can’t even come up with your own material as a cheap comeback which further demonstrates the weakness of your entire argument.

235

Which is why it’s a good idea to understand the subject matter in context before commenting.

The Rainbow coalition and democrats in general have totally coopted the church. They threw the bible away more than a decade ago in an attempt to save a church that was dying financially from a rapidly shrinking membership.

236

In saying that the whole is greater than the some of its parts, a denial that the whole wouldn’t exist without its parts is not uttered.

2 Likes
237

None of this changes the fact that peaceful protesters were driven away so POTUS could have a photo op to fling red meat at his base.

That’s banana republic territory.

POTUS was the “entitled idiot” here, not the protesters.

238

Not a fact.

239

It is a fact.

Why do you think Barr was outside there amongst the crowd just before it all went down?

The excuse that it was “getting close to curfew time” was just that…an excuse.

240

It is not a fact and there are official statements in direct contradiction.

Your assumption of Barr’s reason is an assumption, not a fact.

241

Oh “official statements”.

That changes EVERYTHING.

:roll_eyes: