Why Trump should not meet with Mueller

Forcefield · 2018-07-31T18:35:14.960Z

altair1013:

Man crush? You grossly underestimate my affection for the President. A man crush is what you have for Hillary. See the difference?

Find a single post with Tommy making excuses for Hillary’s ■■■■■■■■■ Now compare that to your daily bullet pointed pretzel twisting. No one here worships Hillary. Investigate her. Lock her up. We do not care.

MidwestIndy · 2018-07-31T18:35:51.231Z

altair1013:

calirepub:

Lets not forget that Hillary never agreed to be interviewed during the Benghazi investigation. The Deep State Republicans didn’t demand anything of her because they figured she was going to be the next president. She got away with more than any other person has ever got away with. She didn’t even talk to the press at any point during her administration. I can’t think of anything more heinous than Hillary Clinton.

The odds of a high ranking government official being held accountable for corruption are about the same as seeing a sasquatch and a space alien in the same day. Accountability is for the peasants. The ruling class takes care of it’s own. It was nothing but a show.

So was lock her up, and a lot of people are it up.

sikofit · 2018-07-31T18:36:12.244Z

TommyLucchese:

altair1013:

Man crush? You grossly underestimate my affection for the President. A man crush is what you have for Hillary. See the difference?

Okay, since a bromance and a man crush are synonyms, the only option left is love? Sexual love?

Ohhhhhkay.

Talk about admitting to being a fanboy

altair1013 · 2018-07-31T18:40:21.942Z

TommyLucchese:

Okay, since a bromance and a man crush are synonyms, the only option left is love? Sexual love?

Ohhhhhkay.

It can be whatever your fantasy wants it to be! Entirely your call. Who am I to judge. But I am growing a little bored, so I’m getting back on topic. If you don’t mind.

calirepub · 2018-07-31T18:43:53.331Z

Anyways, back to the topic of acceptable ways for Trump to meet with Mueller.

How about Trump and Mueller do a taped under oath video conference that Trump is later allowed to selectively edit to remove or add bits of dialogue.

altair1013 · 2018-07-31T19:07:06.375Z

calirepub:

Anyways, back to the topic of acceptable ways for Trump to meet with Mueller.

How about Trump and Mueller do a taped under oath video conference that Trump is later allowed to selectively edit to remove or add bits of dialogue.

I love that idea! Has it ever been done before?

calirepub · 2018-07-31T19:09:45.133Z

altair1013:

I love that idea! Has it ever been done before?

Obama and Hillary did it all the time. Ever wonder why Obama stopped saying “um” all the time towards the end of his presidency? He ordered that they all be edited out. His minions got most of the stupid stuff he said too.

LouC · 2018-07-31T19:15:19.474Z

calirepub:

Trump should only agree to meet with Mueller if he can have Putin in the room.

Amen!

altair1013 · 2018-07-31T19:19:01.174Z

calirepub:

I love that idea! Has it ever been done before?

Obama and Hillary did it all the time. Ever wonder why Obama stopped saying “um” all the time towards the end of his presidency? He ordered that they all be edited out. His minions got most of the stupid stuff he said too.

It’s happening with the Cohen tape right now. Apparently the Cohen tape is a tape of a tape. The original is nowhere to be found.

sikofit · 2018-07-31T19:19:52.497Z

altair1013:

It’s happening with the Cohen tape right now. Apparently the Cohen tape is a tape of a tape. The original is nowhere to be found.

Of course it is a copy. The original is in evidence

altair1013 · 2018-07-31T19:22:33.001Z

sikofit:

It’s happening with the Cohen tape right now. Apparently the Cohen tape is a tape of a tape. The original is nowhere to be found.

Of course it is a copy. The original is in evidence

You mean the original that does not contain any evidence of a crime? It’s still not illegal to offer someone a buyout for non disclosure. Unless you use public funds like congress does.

sikofit · 2018-07-31T19:25:51.872Z

altair1013:

You mean the original that does not contain any evidence of a crime? It’s still not illegal to offer someone a buyout for non disclosure.

That is not necessarily true. When pieced together with other evidence (that may or may not exist) it is likely the tape could show the intent to violate campaign laws

reflechissez · 2018-07-31T19:26:37.077Z

altair1013:

calirepub:

I love that idea! Has it ever been done before?

Obama and Hillary did it all the time. Ever wonder why Obama stopped saying “um” all the time towards the end of his presidency? He ordered that they all be edited out. His minions got most of the stupid stuff he said too.

It’s happening with the Cohen tape right now. Apparently the Cohen tape is a tape of a tape. The original is nowhere to be found.

Where have you looked?

Apocalypto · 2018-07-31T19:26:55.935Z

Remove Wiki.

sikofit · 2018-07-31T19:30:13.026Z

reflechissez:

Where have you looked?

Forcefield · 2018-07-31T19:40:39.209Z

altair1013:

You mean the original that does not contain any evidence of a crime? It’s still not illegal to offer someone a buyout for non disclosure. Unless you use public funds like congress does.

Paying Russian hookers to pee on a bed in Russia isn’t a crime either.

DOLOOP · 2018-07-31T19:45:57.479Z

Orygun:

altair1013:

So you do not believe that Hillary is a liar? Is that so?

I believe she can hold up to intense scrutiny under oath and still not be charged with perjury. I think Trump would perjure himself after the first question asked of him.

It’d start with the oath.

“I, David Dennison, …”

NebraskaFootball · 2018-07-31T21:53:09.438Z

altair1013:

Most investigations are started to investigate a crime. As you said, this one was started to figure out if a crime was committed at all. It’s basically a scavenger hunt. The President should not take part in a scavenger hunt. Especially one where he has been targeted without cause.

You obviously are completely and totally clueless as it relates to law enforcement. Right now, the FBI is investigating the disappearance of a young woman in Iowa who apparently went missing after a jog. There is no specific crime that has been committed. Yet, people are investigating. It is not a crime for her to be gone. She is an adult. Yet, and active investigation exists.

In this case, there were several known crimes to have been committed, and there were several potential crimes that had enough circumstantial evidence surrounding them, that an investigation was the only logical step. That you are so blinded by your devotion and fealty to a man, over that of your country or the rule of law, that you cannot see or accept this reality is no one else’s problem but your own.

You keep rolling on with your chants of no crime, no crime, no crime, which does little more than expose your own ignorance on this subject. Which is undoubtedly going to lead most of us to question your competency on a myriad of other subjects around here as well. If you cannot comprehend these basic realities, then what else are you going to remain willfully obtuse on?

TommyLucchese · 2018-08-01T00:33:34.341Z

I honestly never thought Trump would do ■■■■ this crazy right before the midterm. Shoot his mouth off sure, but not threaten a government shutdown and then try to Twitter-beef with the Kochs, who pretty much every Republican at the federal level are indebted too (including Mike Pompeo lol).

WuWei · 2018-08-01T00:40:02.304Z

NebraskaFootball:

Their fealty lies at the foot of a single man.

J. Edgar Hoover?