vaard
1736
Interesting that you think all my replies are to you…
vaard
1737
Yes, people physically attacked for being gay is the literal definition of being a victim…
Unlike your definition that people not being allowed to attack gays being the real victims…
1 Like
Those are actually victims of brutal anti-gay attacks.
Funny thing is that I could not care less who they are to. My posts are to everyone and are commentary about the post to which I’m responding.
I do that to help Sean or Rush or whoever is monitoring my posts, looking for good material.
vaard
1740
It explains alot the their are those on the right who think being not able to assault gay people makes them the victim in all this…
1 Like
How did the perp know they were gay?
Are those truly free if they aren’t allowed to kill and maim others because of who they love?
1 Like
Yep. Second sigma…at least.
“I was just exercising my God-given 1A right to express disapproval for that deviant lifestyle!”
How does that possibly matter?
Well then I guess the perps just selected them at random and it had nothing to do with them being gay.
Oooo… the question seems to agitate you. We both know why
Yes…actual victims…people beat up and even killed. Not those called mean names. Not those challenged on their bigotry. Real victims.
Are you able to notice the difference? Or not.
1 Like
Seriously? Whatever helps one get thru their day, I guess.
Provide evidence that the perps were not gay too… you know self loathing gays.
Provide evidence they were.
Let thee cast the first stone
It’s an interesting study in the hatred towards gays that even when gays are beat up…excuse it by claiming they did it to themselves.
