Here’s a smart and long time environmentalist leader explaining why renewable energy can’t save the planet. They take too much energy to make and use land to much land to be Eco friendly. He says nuclear has the lowest pollution foot print and saves more lives.
I used to be much more cavalier about nuclear power, since I live near San Onofre. I figured I was one of the people who was receiving safe nuclear power, and everyone should!
But it’s been over 10 years now that the plant has been shuttered, indefinitely, due to cooling system issues…
… should I be happy San Onofre exists, on the coast, a fault zone, with my home in its shadow?
In S. Cal the wind almost always blows from the N. west. Except in the fall when we get Santana winds that blow out to the ocean. (off shore winds). Radiation follows the wind. It does now make a giant circle.
I think this is part of the problem, the perception that living next to something for 20 years is significant in relation to nuclear power generation. As I said, I used to feel the same way; now I live next to a plant that is a full time nuclear waste managment/cooling facility with NO power generation. It’s just a problem being managed with no benefit… and will be forever.
If you listen to the guy he explain one of the reason they did not want to build nuke plants like France did was they were worried about “over consumption”… It was the era of the Erlicks silly book called “the population bomb”. “Over consumption” is code for too high of a standard of living. May produce too many children, etc…so, silly!
If I lived in a bubble of doubt. I’d think the govt is the only way people could make in this horrible world. But, it’s never been so easy to live,and people can make it easily.