Why now? more texts

bootz · 2018-09-13T01:05:07.269Z

have you ever been proven wrong? I do not think you can comprehend when you are wrong. therefore you are always right.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:05:39.508Z

hwyflier:

Sneaky, you’re can read gud

Also, this is ■■■■■■■ hilarious. I’m starting that patreon.

bootz · 2018-09-13T01:06:14.945Z

can you read the word NEWLY

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:06:52.002Z

bootz:

can you read the word NEWLY

Why now? more texts Politics

That’s not the quote, nor is it speaking about the source of the texts, who they were not new to.

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:07:29.890Z

hwyflier:

Listen dude, the timpani is in the attic so there will be no drum roll. Out with it.

Out with what?

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:07:53.537Z

hwyflier:

who put faith in strzok?

It seems like you are.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:08:19.370Z

The punchline you’ve set up twice.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:09:04.194Z

No, this isn’t binary, just because I know is Meadows weaving another tale and that he’s an ass doesn’t mean I have faith in stzock. c’mon man.

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:09:42.875Z

hwyflier:

See where getting back to the part where people who can read well are smashing into those who can’t and I just don’t know what to do about it. Sneaky, you’re can read gud, tell me point blank where I’m wrong and tell me why you believe Meadows lil narrative here.

You said Horowitz addressed all this or something to that effect. He was very clear about scope in his report.

I get the impression he is very unhappy with Strzok.

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:10:15.760Z

hwyflier:

No, this isn’t binary, just because I know is Meadows weaving another tale and that he’s an ass doesn’t mean I have faith in stzock. c’mon man.

Ok, if you say so.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:10:19.285Z

well duh, strzok got fired.

Months ago.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:12:21.331Z

@WuWei You’re pickin at my toes while I’m offering you steak here. Hit me, tell me where I’m wrong and why you believe Meadow’s narrative here?

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:14:04.867Z

Horowitz didn’t fire him.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:14:53.329Z

Who said he did?

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:16:09.893Z

I don’t understand the disconnect, maybe its this:

We all agree Horowitz is a good inspector general, no?

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:16:48.683Z

hwyflier:

Who said he did?

So it’s irrelevant to the conversation.

What do you know about this Andrew Weissmann fellow?

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:19:19.489Z

WuWei:

Andrew Weissmann

At this pace this will take all night. Not my Andrew Weissmann facts, but the getting to the part where you tell me why I’m wrong on this topic and why you believe Meadow’s tale o’ the texts.

Just say it.

WuWei · 2018-09-13T01:21:12.674Z

hwyflier:

At this pace this will take all night. Not my Andrew Weissmann facts, but the getting to the part where you tell me why I’m wrong on this topic and why you believe Meadow’s tale o’ the texts.

Just say it.

I don’t know if you’re wrong or not about Meadows, nor do I care. He’s an errand boy.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:27:57.212Z

WuWei:

I don’t know if you’re wrong or not about Meadows, nor do I care. He’s an errand boy.

Ugh. In this thread I’ve presented an argument. I laid it out. Unlike others I’ve offered it all up in big meaty chunks. I’ve offered myself into a vulnerable position. Frankly, I’ve been doing it while quite buzzed while enjoying my rainy creek.

Maybe I’m wrong. About all of it. But no one else seems to be offering up these meaty chunks… no one is refuting anything, no one really is telling me i’m wrong at all…all I seem to get are posts picking at me with questions that don’t seem to go anywhere.

I believe I have shown that Meadows has fed us unfiltered ■■■■■■■■ that is incredibly easy to identify. Where am I wrong?

WuWei:

He’s an errand boy.

Now that there is the 100% truth.

hwyflier · 2018-09-13T01:43:41.956Z