How is it not worth discussing?
The article and the op were based on the falsehood that these kids were forced to be there. Even the article admits that it was a simple mistake with the passage I quoted. The article and the op are only interested in attacking the freedom of assembly in government funded schools. Ginning up outrage over one untruth to attack a policy that is not illegal, but you’d like for it to be, is a classic fever dream.
