If what you want to believe is true…there would have to be republicans that also buy into the election stealing as well. I have worked so many elections inside the polling place, I know one thing for sure. There are Republicans and there are Democrats with the voting machines and the ballots and the tabulations from the time the poll opens, to the time they close. No one and I mean no one, has the ability to do anything fraudulent when there are republicans and democrats both watching the balloting and the vote counting.
You are saying that when the OBSERVERS left…that Republicans along with Democrats, conspired to steal the election from Trump.
That is where your entire story goes straight into the dumper. If this was indeed a stolen election…then Republicans in Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin took place in one of the best thought out, and incredibly impossible schemes to steal an election ever in the history of the world.
That is what you sheeple need to be worried about.
1 Like
Ya know, @Chris was kind enough to respond to this in full, complete with supporting links, at the top of this thread.
And yet here you are, 150 posts later, asking the same thing… as if the answer wasn’t already provided to you. It was. And Chris informed you that 1) Maricopa County is, in fact, doing an audit, and 2) that is it is illegal for the County to hand over the ballots to the Senate.
So you’re twisting this narrative for dramatic effect, when the reality is 1) the audit seemingly is going forward, and 2) following the request you’d like to see happen is illegal.
Again, this was provided to you long ago… but it’s quite clear that you just chose to ignore it. It directly addresses your questions and your concerns, but you purposely acted like you haven’t seen it so you can continue on willfully standing in denial.
Ignorance at it’s finest…
1 Like
yes, I have.
google: “border patrol counts turn arounds as depotations” and refresh your failing memory.
Jezcoe
306
Two independent audits have shown no shenanigans.
Can we stop this now?
Smyrna
307
I already won the discussion because I’m right but you’re right in that I went personal so I stopped…deleted it before you responded…and went to work.
Smyrna
308
That had nothing to do with what I’ve said.
WuWei
309

WorldWatcher:
There was no “false pretense” involved. Election Officials were planning to shut down then the mail-in ballot workers were released, however after the fact they were told to keep counting. “False pretense” involves premeditation, there was no premeditation - the situation changed. Two very different things.
Yes there was. False pretense does not require premeditation.
It was bad faith to not communicate the change to the observers.
This isn’t true. A total of 35 vote fraud cases have been referred for prosecution in Georgia. Not all of them will be convicted, but if we accept all 35 then that’s not enough to change the results of the election . Glad I could help you out on this burning question.
They won’t even let a bipartisan group look to answer those questions. Probably because they know the answers will be embarrassing.

wayoutwest:
And yet here you are, 150 posts later, asking the same thing… as if the answer wasn’t already provided to you. It was. And Chris informed you that 1) Maricopa County is, in fact, doing an audit
Do you think it was the intention of lawmakers, when they included requiring ballots and machines to be sealed, that no one other than the original vetting and counting agency could ever access ballots to forensically inspect them in cases where the integrity of the vote vetting and counting was questioned by half of the population?

Jezcoe:
Yes… the answer is yes
So, they anticipated a situation where a chief election official or election board/commission could be partisan/hijacked/blackmailed/or bought to corrupt the process and present fake numbers to steal an election, but decided the best course of action would be to leave any investigation of those numbers completely in the hands of the same chief election official or election board/commission?
What you think us natives are still locked on the rez and not allowed to leave? You need to check your privilege because what do you know about how us natives live.
Now your putting words in my mouth that I did not say. What is it with some people not being able to read what is typed?
How do you know where they voted and when did I say they voted or where they voted?
Jezcoe
318

Paul_Thomson:
So, they anticipated a situation where a chief election official or election board/commission could be partisan/hijacked/blackmailed/or bought to corrupt the process and present fake numbers to steal an election,
Got to prove that part first.
There is zero and I mean zilcho evidence for that.
Thanks for making my point for me

Paul_Thomson:

Jezcoe:
Yes… the answer is yes
So, they anticipated a situation where a chief election official or election board/commission could be partisan/hijacked/blackmailed/or bought to corrupt the process and present fake numbers to steal an election, but decided the best course of action would be to leave any investigation of those numbers completely in the hands of the same chief election official or election board/commission?
Except that isn’t what happened.
Two independent auditing firms were hired to review the results and both came to the same independent conclusion.
.
.
.
.WW
2 Likes
Jezcoe
321
The election wasn’t stolen.
2 Likes