Clearly Raffensberger is a rabid anti-Trump globalist who only voted for Trump to throw everyone off the scent.
1 Like
Smyrna
202
Just leave the hogwash out and answer my question? If you communicated something and everyone in the room put on their coats to leave and that was not your intent, would you not say something to stop it?
1 Like
Jezcoe
203
So what do you think it was?
What actually happened?
Smyrna
204
There is only one reason that makes any sense and that is that dishonesty took place in counting that they did not want witnessed.
Jezcoe
205
Well let us focus in on this one.
What was the intent?
Smyrna
206
fraud
Now why would Maricopa County obstruct a forensic audit that the state senators have requested?
1 Like
Jezcoe
207
Is there any evidence that fraud actually happened? It is easy to claim it… but is there actual evidence beyond a hunch?
Like… is there no chain of custody on the ballots that are under question?
In subsequent recounts, were there anomalies found because of these ballots?
Smyrna
208
What took place isn’t proof of fraud but it is a basis that should initiate a forensic audit on the ballots and the Dominion machines.
Jezcoe
209
There was a full hand recount of the State of Georgia.
Were there any anomalies found?
But we are jumping around issues.
With the ballots in question that were counted after people went home… was there a chain of custody problem with them? Did the recount show any anomalies?
Other than the hunch that something is up… is there any real evidence?
sikofit
210
No there is not. There is literally nothing
Smyrna
211
Oh…you must have thought I said a hand recount? I didn’t. I said a forensic audit…period. I don’t want the same mistakes recounted twice. I want it forensically audited and there is a big difference. We should all be united in this, especially when what was being said, doesn’t make sense or add up as factual.
1 Like
Jezcoe
212
How would that audit be done?
What would you expect for them to look for?
We don’t have the exact details of how that all went down so I can’t answer your question. It remains a mystery.
Regardless, we saw the cases loaded and later unloaded and counted. What do you think happened since it was all on video?
Smyrna
215
Is the vote from a LIVE, IN STATE, REGISTERED VOTER? If not, throw it out.
Does the ballot have a signature that matches the voter registration card? If not, throw it out.
Is the vote the ONLY vote from an IN STATE, REGISTERED VOTER? If not, throw out ALL votes from that voter as the voter violated Federal Election Laws. Then arrest that voter and prosecute him or her for voter fraud.
Was the vote tampered with, illegible, or marked in any manner that does not demonstrate a clear vote for either candidate? If so, throw it out.
Did the vote as marked, actually record for the proper candidate when entered in the electronic scanner? If not, take a vote away from the candidate who received the improper credit and credit the proper candidate.
ALL votes received AFTER 8pm on November 3 in “dumps” must be sourced back to the original location that they came from and individuals involved in delivering the “dumps” must be questioned intensely to determine who was behind the dumping of votes in the wee hours of the morning on November 4 and beyond. Anyone involved in the fraudulent dumping should be arrested and prosecuted.
EVERY polling worker in every voter precinct of the key states in this election should be interviewed under immunity to give them an opportunity to come forward and disclose any voter fraud they witnessed or were instructed to perform by their supervisors or Democratic operatives.
EVERY postal worker in the state, should be given the opportunity under immunity to come forward and disclose any voter fraud they witnessed or were instructed to perform by their supervisors or Democratic operatives.
1 Like
Smyrna
216

Borgia_dude:
It remains a mystery.
It’s a mystery that observers all put on their coats and left at the same time? What instigated that? The observers said they were told that everything was being shut down until morning. The actions observed in the video sure appear to confirm that now don’t they? Why did they leave? People should be investigated under oath by professionals and let’s get to the bottom of this…agreed?
1 Like
sikofit
217
Interviewed under immunity? No consequence for lying to investigators? That’s insane and not how an audit is done
Smyrna
218
I want integrity in our election…how about you? I believe those same professionals are capable of connecting the dots of truth. Just because an accusation is made, does not make it credible but what it may very well do, is bring to light, something that was hidden. I don’t want to hear lies whether they help or hurt my case. I’m in search of the truth and all of us should be united in this? Are you?
sikofit
219
You don’t get that by conducting mass interviews of observers with the potential for bias without any repercussion for perjury
You mean knowing that they were being recorded on camera and it was being live streamed to the internet.
That reason?
.
.
.
.WW