As often as both have been explained to you why are you still repeating the same question?
See the US Constitution.
voting goes on for at least three weeks in every state in the union.
As often as both have been explained to you why are you still repeating the same question?
See the US Constitution.
voting goes on for at least three weeks in every state in the union.
I have the wherewithal to ask questions.
You already know the answers so what is the point?
Itâs like the irritating child in the back of the car who keeps asking âare we there yetâ every five miles.
Again, you know the answers so what is the point?
It is my prerogative to post as I see fit within the ToS of this site.
Nobody said otherwise, why canât you answer the question?
You know the answers so what is the point of continually repeating it?
An exchange of ideas and points of view are integral to the success of a site like this.
You arenât exchanging anything, you already know the answers and have for months.
Itâs all out blitz at this point for the establishment to sink Sanders again. I donât think it was an accident that the mic was live and zoomed in on Warren and Sanders after the debate when she told him âI think you called me a liar on national TVâ.
They want him out.
The way the question was framed was a low move by CNN, even the audience caught it.
oh i know it doesnt sound smart to you, with all those new democrat voters along the southern border, and LA countyâŚ
it must sound downright crazy ever since 2016.
ever since then thereâs an amazing new revelation among the left and democrats that they are suddenly more knowledgeable than the founders about proportional representation and government. in fact anything in the constitution that stands in the way of their political objectives should be removed or altered
He like most demâs prefers mob rule.
i think dems go beyond that actually. âby all means necessaryâ is their general approach to anything, regardless of elections (eg, cemetery votes), constitution, procedure, protocolâŚ
now if they lose elections they just impeach, for revenge, over nothing
Democrats have given up even the pretext of respecting either the law or constitution.
Now itâs âwin at any cost by any means necessaryâ.
exactly! and they know it, but are flagrant in their disregard because they have massive propaganda support in tweeter and media, and ânewsâ etc
Bernie Sanders is not really a Democrat. But if Sanders is not selected as the 2020 Democratic nominee, Republicans will be going on about how it was rigged against him again.
it already is apparent. as it was then when the DNC was caught doing it
itâs not like itâs a conspiracy. itâs a matter of record
Australia has used preferential voting and proportional representation for many decades.
I have some other suggestions.
Australia should be using the US as a model.
Your citizens had their gun rights revoked.
Not a system I would ever respect, let alone emulate.
What happened to the emu?
Australiaâs electoral system is vastly superior to the USAâs.
I am glad you like it.
You know we have a saying here.
Kangaroo Court and it is apparently an American invention (from WIKI)
The term kangaroo court is often erroneously believed to have its origin from the courts of Australiaâs penal colonies.[3] The Oxford English Dictionary cites the first published instance of the term as from an American source, A Stray Yankee in Texas by Philip Paxton, published in the year 1853.[4] There are, however, earlier instances of the term including an 1841 article in The Daily Picayune in New Orleans that quotes another publication, the Concordia Intelligencer reporting several lynchings instituted âon charges of the Kangaroo court.â The Picayune article also asks âWhat is a Kangaroo court, neighbor?â[5] Some sources suggest that it may have been popularized during the California Gold Rush of 1849 to which many thousands of Australians flocked. In consequence of the Australian diggersâ presence, it may have come about as a description of the hastily carried-out proceedings used to deal with the issue of claim jumping miners.[3] Ostensibly, the term comes from the notion of justice proceeding âby leapsâ, like a kangaroo[6] â in other words, âjumping overâ (intentionally ignoring) evidence that would be in favour of the defendant. An alternative theory is that as these courts are often convened quickly to deal with an immediate issue, they are called kangaroo courts as they have âjumped upâ out of nowhere like a kangaroo. Another possibility is that the phrase could refer to the pouch of a kangaroo, meaning the court is in someoneâs pocket. The phrase is popular in the UK, US, Australia and New Zealand and is still in common use.[7] In South Korea, the equivalent term for a kangaroo court is âpeopleâs trialâ, originating from the time of the Korean War when such courts operated in South Korea during North Korean occupation.[8]
Claim jumpers.