Apparently decades of Biden family corruption don’t matter to you.
Jezcoe: Ben_Natuf: Jezcoe:actual and real corruption
lol… your imaginings do not corruption make
Decades of corruption.
But I know… it doesn’t matter.
Apparently decades of Biden family corruption don’t matter to you.
The proof… the soggy laptop… you guys are so easy.
I’ll bet it has something to do with Brandon believing Putin just raided Russia.
This is your POTUS Brandonites.
Chilean company wants to mine In undeveloped US wilderness.
What difference does “Chilean” make?
Obama says no.
Owner of Chilean company rents out large house in Washington DC to Ivana Trump and Jared Kushner.
Trump says yes.
Biden looks at that deal and says no.
Seems about right.
So much better to do it where you can’t see it?
I would agree that the lease should go to a US company, if there was one.
I know…I know… this is where someone says “big guy”.
It is wild that President Biden has to made out to be super corrupt and how bad that is all the while excusing the actual and real corruption of the former President as some sort of “gotcha”
It is quite funny.
One of the most out of touch comments in the history of this forum.
e7alr:Just drawing the obvious conclusion.
As did Its a bad deal for America.
Allan
Why?
…
Jezcoe:I know…I know… this is where someone says “big guy”.
It is wild that President Biden has to made out to be super corrupt and how bad that is all the while excusing the actual and real corruption of the former President as some sort of “gotcha”
It is quite funny.
One of the most out of touch comments in the history of this forum.
Nah… the entire “Joe Biden is sooper corrupt” thing is built out of a willful misunderstanding of Shokin and a laptop of soggy origins.
It is funny how easy it all is.
And just how is an underground mine, employing US employees, conducted to US mining standards, producing US resources and stimulating economic activity in a region of the US a bad deal? The status quo is import a larger portion of the needed materials, from nations that don’t follow US environmental rules, all the while supporting jobs and economic activity outside the US in places like China. So explain the logic that makes this US mining operation a bad deal.
The argument seems to be over whether Twin Metals’ plans will prevent acidic runoff from leaching into big water reservoirs. Twin Metals says yes it will…environmental scientists say no.
Are any of you here environmental scientists? Do you know enough to judge whose claim is more based on science?
If Twin Metals is wrong, and another precious resource…water…is contaminated, are you prepared to write that off as the “cost of doing business”?
Or are you just making assumptions based on your own a priori truths?
By the way I am not coming down either in favor of or against this decision. The reason? I don’t know enough information upon which to base an opinion.
My guess is…many of you who have come down one way or another don’t have the information either, and are letting your political biases sway you into making an opinion.
Nah… the entire “Joe Biden is sooper corrupt” thing is built out of a willful misunderstanding of Shokin and a laptop of soggy origins.
It is funny how easy it all is.
What’s not funny is how so many are blind to the truth that completely surrounds them and only see the lying narratives being presented.
when it comes to government corruption brandon inc far outperforms
the denial… russia hoax… the masters love you guys
environmental scientists
PurpnGold: e7alr: Jezcoe:Chilean company wants to mine In undeveloped US wilderness.
Obama says no.
Owner of Chilean company rents out large house in Washington DC to Ivana Trump and Jared Kushner.
Trump says yes.
Biden looks at that deal and says no.
Seems about right.
So the deal is off until they offer Hunter a spot on the board and Joe’s brother and sister consulting contracts. Makes perfect sense now.
Funny how you skipped over the part where Trump said yes after his family was taken care of by that company.
But yes Hunter
Just drawing the obvious conclusion.
Your “obvious conclusion” is just your fantasy scenario that you’re upset about even though you made it up. You get that right?
Or are you just making assumptions based on your own a priori truths?
Is that not precisely what the “environmental scientists” are doing?
JayJay:environmental scientists
They exist.
Your point?
So do “mining scientists”
Nah… the entire “Joe Biden is sooper corrupt” thing is built out of a willful misunderstanding of Shokin and a laptop of soggy origins.
It is funny how easy it all is.
Coming from a peddler of the trump Russia collusion lie…the Kavanaugh lies…from all the fake crap you and your cronies have tried to sell over the last few years I shall ascribe your smartest guy in the room certainty all the credit it deserves…
None.
JayJay:Or are you just making assumptions based on your own a priori truths?
Is that not precisely what the “environmental scientists” are doing?
They at least have the data and the training.
I guarantee that almost of the people here have either and are just having a knee-jerk political reaction.
I’m not going down your “truth is unknowable” rabbit hole today, but by all means feel free to indulge yourself.
then you should have no problem identifying those without a political agenda who are “concerned”.
They at least have the data and the training.
So do mining scientists.
I guarantee that almost of the people here have either and are just having a knee-jerk political reaction.
Of course.
I’m not going down your “truth is unknowable” rabbit hole today, but by all means feel free to indulge yourself.
It’s your rabbit hole. A priori