Are you making up questions as you go?
LBJ was wrong. He said the VRA and CRA would cost Democrats the south for a generation. It has now been multiple generations.
Never worry. Someone in another thread will be along to explain how the Democrats were the party of slavery and the KKK.
So the documented voting rights violations that would lead to a dozen or so states being returned to pre-clearance requirements have nothing to to with discriminatory behavior.
“Violations”, as defined by libspeak.
H_Arendt: calirepub: H_Arendt:are you claiming the Republican acting selflessly in this matter
I’m claiming that Republicans are doing what’s in America’s best interest.
Why is not allowing citizens the right to vote in America’s best interest. Next you will claim that not allowing citizens the right to bear arms is in America’s best interest I suppose.
Who is not being allowed to vote and how?
Every study of where voting machines are placed and how many are placed in different neighborhoods answers that question. For one example, in Tulsa, the only polling place in the largest African-American community was closed and replaced by a location several miles away with no public transportation.
I think everyone here who wonders why African-Americans vote overwhelmingly Democratic, needs to slow down and think for a while… because the answer to that question runs through this thread like a river.
Why is not allowing citizens the right to vote in America’s best interest.
Nobody is “not allowing” citizens to vote.
You are totally fabricating your argument.
And that’s also the line of arguments that Dem politicians push, which is why Dem initiatives are not to be trusted.
H_Arendt:Yet actions in Georgia and Florida to cite obviously examples, disproportionately discriminate against African-American citizens.
“Discriminate” as defined by libspeak.
Discriminate as defined by statistics: % of citizens who are prevented from voting. This isn’t liberal, it is simply a matter numbers that you appear to dislike.
The answer to the OP question was right there in the article he referenced, all along.
“The bill before us today would turn those federal shields that protect voters into political weapons,” said Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, adding that the legislation would do so “when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that those states or localities engaged in any discriminatory behavior when it comes to voting.”
H_Arendt:Why is not allowing citizens the right to vote in America’s best interest.
Nobody is “not allowing” citizens to vote.
You are totally fabricating your argument.
And that’s also the line of arguments that Dem politicians push, which is why Dem initiatives are not to be trusted.
The cases cited in identifying which states would require pre-clearance are the evidence that you clearly are wrong in your assertion.
Why not allow the largest number of law-abiding citizens to vote?
WuWei: H_Arendt: calirepub: H_Arendt:are you claiming the Republican acting selflessly in this matter
I’m claiming that Republicans are doing what’s in America’s best interest.
Why is not allowing citizens the right to vote in America’s best interest. Next you will claim that not allowing citizens the right to bear arms is in America’s best interest I suppose.
Who is not being allowed to vote and how?
Every study of where voting machines are placed and how many are placed in different neighborhoods answers that question. For one example, in Tulsa, the only polling place in the largest African-American community was closed and replaced by a location several miles away with no public transportation.
I think everyone here who wonders why African-Americans vote overwhelmingly Democratic, needs to slow down and think for a while… because the answer to that question runs through this thread like a river.
Who is being denied the right to vote and how?
I have to go several miles with no public transportation available to vote. Have for years. Am I being denied my right to vote?
Why do you believe black people are helpless?
% of citizens who are prevented from voting.
You are making it up.
And “studies” designed to arrive at a particular conclusion are never to be believed.
Why not allow the largest number of law-abiding citizens to vote?
They are allowed. All they have to do is register and show up at the poll during the time with an ID.
Just like my white ass does.
Discriminate as defined by statistics: % of citizens who are prevented from voting. This isn’t liberal, it is simply a matter numbers that you appear to dislike.
How are they “prevented”?
H_Arendt:% of citizens who are prevented from voting.
You are making it up.
And “studies” designed to arrive at a particular conclusion are never to be believed.
The Federal Election Commission is not something I made up.
If you are right, and there is no racially discriminatory intent in the rules states are passing, why would you object to having those rules pre-cleared? Where’s the harm?
Guvnah: H_Arendt:% of citizens who are prevented from voting.
You are making it up.
And “studies” designed to arrive at a particular conclusion are never to be believed.
The Federal Election Commission is not something I made up.
If you are right, and there is no racially discriminatory intent in the rules states are passing, why would you object to having those rules pre-cleared? Where’s the harm?
The harm is continuing to punish the southern states as stated by SCOTUS.
H_Arendt: Guvnah: H_Arendt:% of citizens who are prevented from voting.
You are making it up.
And “studies” designed to arrive at a particular conclusion are never to be believed.
The Federal Election Commission is not something I made up.
If you are right, and there is no racially discriminatory intent in the rules states are passing, why would you object to having those rules pre-cleared? Where’s the harm?
The harm is continuing to punish the southern states as stated by SCOTUS.
The new rules do not harm southern states. They apply equally to all states. As I pointed out to you earlier, the new rules include California and New York as states requiring pre-clearance. Are you so busy typing you have not had time to look at a map?
H_Arendt:Why Do Republicans Oppose Updating the Voting Rights Act?
An answer to your question is right in your link:
“The bill before us today would turn those federal shields that protect voters into political weapons,” said Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, adding that the legislation would do so “when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that those states or localities engaged in any discriminatory behavior when it comes to voting.”
I’ll say this. There isn’t a bill that only Dems push that I trust. The entirety of Dem politicking as of late is to weaponize government.
Both parties.
Why else do we have examples of GOP-controlled state legislatures with GOP governors, after an election where a Dem has won the governorship but the GOP maintains control of the legislature, passing laws that restrict executive power?
At any rate, I’m at the point where I want to run an experiment. Strike down the VRA and let’s see what happens. Get the sides to have to declare their intentions.
The new rules do not harm southern states.
That’s not for you to say. Those are your feeeeeeelings, just like “denied to vote”.
I’m going off your posts.
Why not allow the largest number of law-abiding citizens to vote?
They are allowed. You think my assertions are wrong, yet you’re the one with the profoundly bogus claim. Sticking to that argument removes any semblance of credibility you want to pretend you have.
Guvnah: H_Arendt:Why Do Republicans Oppose Updating the Voting Rights Act?
An answer to your question is right in your link:
“The bill before us today would turn those federal shields that protect voters into political weapons,” said Representative Doug Collins of Georgia, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, adding that the legislation would do so “when there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that those states or localities engaged in any discriminatory behavior when it comes to voting.”
I’ll say this. There isn’t a bill that only Dems push that I trust. The entirety of Dem politicking as of late is to weaponize government.
Both parties.
Why else do we have examples of GOP-controlled state legislatures with GOP governors, after an election where a Dem has won the governorship but the GOP maintains control of the legislature, passing laws that restrict executive power?
At any rate, I’m at the point where I want to run an experiment. Strike down the VRA and let’s see what happens. Get the sides to have to declare their intentions.
Elections have consequences.
Where’s the harm?
Already stated. Please try to keep up.