Why did the democratic party suddenly become so pro war?

Paul_Thomson · 2020-09-21T16:06:52.569Z

altair1013:

Right? I am still waiting for the libs to tell me why they are now pro war. Crickets.

That’s where the money is for them. The military industrial complex has a lot of dosh to hand out to pollies who will do their bidding. Trump isn’t, so the Dems are stepping up to the plate for the cash. Money buys power.

altair1013 · 2020-09-21T16:08:18.275Z

Paul_Thomson:

That’s where the money is for them. The military industrial complex has a lot of dosh to hand out to pollies who will do their bidding. Trump isn’t, so the Dems are stepping up to the plate for the cash. Money buys power.

Sure. But why does the average liberal on the street support more war?

Safiel · 2020-09-21T16:11:21.311Z

When the ■■■■ where either two of the major parties not bloody ■■■■■■■ warmongers???

Well for the Republican Party, we can exclude the period of time prior to 8:00 am Hawaii time on December 7th, 1941.

But since that moment, both parties have been non-stop warmongering machines.

noSpaces · 2020-09-21T16:25:03.804Z

It’s not like the flip flopping is one sided. There were cries that the Taliban were going to topple Pakistan and get the nukes and that we don’t negotiate with terrorists, etc. Yet now we are openly negotiating with the Taliban and ready to leave them largely unsupervised by a US presence. Things change.

JayJay · 2020-09-21T16:28:33.496Z

noSpaces:

It’s not like the flip flopping is one sided. There were cries that the Taliban were going to topple Pakistan and get the nukes and that we don’t negotiate with terrorists, etc. Yet now we are openly negotiating with the Taliban and ready to leave them largely unsupervised by a US presence. Things change.

And it’s not complaints that we are extricating ourselves from wars.

It’s how we are doing it.

By acceding to demands of strongmen like Erdogan instead of using our power to tell him to get bent…I.e. leaving on our terms instead of because Erdogan threatened us.

Or relaxing pressure on North Korea, lending Kim legitimacy, while getting precisely nothing in return.

You can extricate from wars from a position of strength…or you can do it like Chamberlain.

The latter sets you up for problems further down the road…that a Dem President will likely have to clean up, and therefore get blamed for.

The Norquist Plan applied to foreign policy.

altair1013 · 2020-09-21T16:40:39.169Z

JayJay:

And it’s not complaints that we are extricating ourselves from wars.

Yes it is. They freaked out when Trump decided he didn’t want a war in Syria.

JayJay · 2020-09-21T16:52:40.119Z

altair1013:

JayJay:

And it’s not complaints that we are extricating ourselves from wars.

Yes it is. They freaked out when Trump decided he didn’t want a war in Syria.

No…they didn’t.

Axxowiz · 2020-09-21T17:09:37.677Z

Regardless of which party did what, we do know were Biden stands on military intervention from past votes. From Politifact.

“Biden as a senator voted for resolutions that supported interventions in Iraq and Yugoslavia (Serbia and Montenegro). As vice president, he followed the policies of the Obama administration, which included interventions in Syria and Libya”.

There are those in the Democratic Party that are not hawks but the last two nominees for president for the democrats have both been hawks, with a record to show.

DougBH · 2020-09-21T17:10:40.537Z

Better war than agree with Trump. Its been their philosophy for four years.

altair1013 · 2020-09-21T17:12:41.563Z

JayJay:

altair1013:

Yes it is. They freaked out when Trump decided he didn’t want a war in Syria.

No…they didn’t.

Riiight! Now, I clearly remembering them thanking the President for keeping us out of another war. Thanks for the reminder.

Cratic3947 · 2020-09-21T17:15:35.715Z

I don’t know, during the Bush admin many dems acted like anti-war Monks with perfect piety. “Stop the endless war” yard signs and bumper stickers were everywhere. They yelled bout how our Intel community was incompetent, and wanted to get out of Iraq now!

Then Obama’s elected and they invade Libya for no reason and leave it worse than Iraq… Now they want to send other people’s kids to fight in Syria? It’s one odd group on the left…

JayJay · 2020-09-21T17:43:24.826Z

altair1013:

JayJay:

altair1013:

Yes it is. They freaked out when Trump decided he didn’t want a war in Syria.

No…they didn’t.

Riiight! Now, I clearly remembering them thanking the President for keeping us out of another war. Thanks for the reminder.

I clearly see you trying to frame the conversation to fit your view of reality and failing.

But you keep being you.

altair1013 · 2020-09-21T21:11:49.494Z

JayJay:

I clearly see you trying to frame the conversation to fit your view of reality and failing.

But you keep being you.

I see clearly you are trying to avoid why liberals have suddenly become war hawks and are failing. Bigly.

But you keep being you.

Paul_Thomson · 2020-09-22T02:56:04.450Z

[quote=“JayJay, post:17, topic:235546, full:true”]

altair1013:

JayJay:

And it’s not complaints that we are extricating ourselves from wars.
[/quote]

Yes it is. They freaked out when Trump decided he didn’t want a war in Syria.

No…they didn’t.

3d-render-extreme-closeup-illuminated-260nw-526328878

GrandWazoo · 2020-09-22T03:10:37.918Z

altair1013:

They have been demanding military spending cuts for decades. They want to cut the military budget then insist that we send troops into battle. It’s totally bat ■■■■ crazy. I would love to hear an explanation.

Okay, how is this. Currently our military can beat the ■■■■ out of anyone 20 times over. So what if we reduce the military budget a little. We would still be able to beat the ■■■■ out of anyone 18 times over.

Safiel · 2020-09-22T03:22:41.626Z

GrandWazoo:

altair1013:

They have been demanding military spending cuts for decades. They want to cut the military budget then insist that we send troops into battle. It’s totally bat ■■■■ crazy. I would love to hear an explanation.

Okay, how is this. Currently our military can beat the ■■■■ out of anyone 20 times over. So what if we reduce the military budget a little. We would still be able to beat the ■■■■ out of anyone 18 times over.

It is not about beating anybody any amount of times over.

It is about feeding the defense contractors.

It always has been.

Paul_Thomson · 2020-09-22T09:27:20.422Z

It’s general engineering practice. You always over-engineer a solution to a problem. Better than the beams collapsing because someone added one more kilogram than expected to the floor load.

johnrandolph · 2020-09-22T10:50:29.528Z

They learned a hard lesson in the 70’s. Peace and prosperity don’t sell in US politics. They’ve tried to out warmonger the GOPers ever since.

Ben_Natuf · 2020-09-22T11:07:19.826Z

suddenly?

they’ve been trying to convince us we’re at war with russia for 4 years.

Ben_Natuf · 2020-09-22T11:10:43.374Z

really?

our number 1 adversary globally is China. The only way we could beat them is if our nukes landed before they launched any.