I’m not acting. They are not distant past. They are simply past. There is no serious conservative or religious movement to bring them back. And don’t forget, both parties including Hillary and Obama opposed equal rights. I was pro gay marriage before either one of them were. Relax. You have nothing to fear. This is the best time in history to be gay. For most people, your co workers, neighbors, etc. It’s a non issue.
So you agree that conservatives who were worried about Hillary Clinton attacking their Christian religion were a bit crazy. Cool!
There is no serious conservative or religious movement to bring them back.
And that’s precisely because people actively cared about and fought against religious beliefs about gay marriage being codified in our law
So you agree that conservatives who were worried about Hillary Clinton attacking their Christian religion were a bit crazy. Cool!
No. They should lose sleep.
What should cause us sleepless nights is a left wing that wants to bully and shame Christians into voting for a candidate who wants to abolish Christianity’s–especially Catholic–central teachings and tenets. If you want Christians to vote for your candidate, then perhaps next time call on him/her to support religious freedom and to respect religious teachings and beliefs. Otherwise count on Christians to vote for the adulterer who respects religious freedoms and Christian teachings even if th…
A candidate that wants to “abolish christianitys teachings and tenants”
You havent “lol’d” or laugh emoji in any of the posts.
Sounds more like you got caught with your foot in your mouth talking about evangelicals concern that government was going to force beliefs on them through law
I seldom use emojis. Yesterday was an exception, not the rule. I cannot help your lack of understanding or your jumping to the wrong conclusions. It is clear from the above post you have no wish to understand, so play your game and enjoy your “wins.” Meanwhile, know I am amused.
I seldom use emojis. Yesterday was an exception, not the rule. I cannot help your lack of understanding or your jumping to the wrong conclusions. It is clear from the above post you have no wish to understand, so play your game and enjoy your “wins.” Meanwhile, know I am amused.
Except you arent laughing in any form. You’ve in the past endorsed fear about Clinton wanting to get rid of christianity
What should cause us sleepless nights is a left wing that wants to bully and shame Christians into voting for a candidate who wants to abolish Christianity’s–especially Catholic–central teachings and tenets. If you want Christians to vote for your candidate, then perhaps next time call on him/her to support religious freedom and to respect religious teachings and beliefs. Otherwise count on Christians to vote for the adulterer who respects religious freedoms and Christian teachings even if th…
I’m sorry but you seem to deny what you type A LOT
I don’t know. I have heard some people opine it may have been Mrs. Clinton’s thoughts about religion when she said that deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed.
There is absolutely no communication of “amusenent” or “laughter”. You got caught defending evangelicals being concerned about government forcing beliefs. After railing against atheist concerns. You then played it off as “laughing at evangelicals” (which you didnt) - even though your posting history has you agreeing with them. It’s really transparent.
Oh the hypocrisy
How are you defining hypocrisy? I said what I meant and I meant what I said. Perhaps if I spoke more slowly? What I noted in that above thread is that a group of people were trying to shame people into not supporting President Trump, accusing them of not following good Christian teachings. I pointed out the other candidate was not spouting good Christian teachings, either. What you think you “caught” me at is beyond me. First you complain that Christians voting their religious beliefs are forcing religion on you. Next you complain about Christians not voting according to what you believe their religious beliefs should be. Finally when I offer a possible explanation on what some Christians may be thinking, you call me a hypocrite. You are harder to please than my mother–and there was a time nothing could please her. Ah, the memories.
Here’s another doozy
The Bible records the history of the times in which it was written. And, until the eighteenth century, there was no separation of Church and State. It was as natural for citizens of those times to think in terms of a unified Church and State as it is for us today to think in terms of separation of the two. Separation of Church and State is a recent development, and one not always followed in certain parts of the Middle East and Asia. It has been one great experiment in the West. The State …
Just admit you empathized with evangelicals fear/concern withHillary. .
I said what I meant and I meant what I said.
But you just said you were laughing at people who thought it was possible
Huh? I’m laughing that people think that it could happen!
Even though you’ve said in other threads you share their beliefs.
This is ridiculous. How can we have a conversation if you consistently deny what your posts literally say?
I pointed out the other candidate was not spouting good Christian teachings, either.
No you didnt. You said we should lose sleep about libs and Clinton wanting to dismantle Chrustianity. Again, we can read your posts.
What should cause us sleepless nights is a left wing that wants to bully and shame Christians into voting for a candidate who wants to abolish Christianity’s–especially Catholic–central teachings and tenets. If you want Christians to vote for your candidate, then perhaps next time call on him/her to support religious freedom and to respect religious teachings and beliefs. Otherwise count on Christians to vote for the adulterer who respects religious freedoms and Christian teachings even if th…
And that’s precisely because people actively cared about and fought against religious beliefs about gay marriage being codified in our law
Awesome! We have made huge progress! Don’t worry about these laws being repealed. I think there is little interest in doing so. Don’t you?
So you agree that conservatives who were worried about Hillary Clinton attacking their Christian religion were a bit crazy. Cool!
Nope, not what I said. I will type more slowly. I said that many of us were laughing that Hillary thought she could change Catholic teaching. Personally, I doubted she could change Evangelical teachings either. But I did hear some Evangelicals did not want her as President.
I’ll repeat: I did not want her as President, either, but for entirely different reasons. And, no, just like I did not with President Trump, I didn’t investigate Mrs. Clinton’s degree of Christianity either. I was listening to the government policies each favored.
Awesome! We have made huge progress! Don’t worry about these laws being repealed. I think there is little interest in doing so. Don’t you?
I never said I was worried about them being repealed. I was explaining why atheists care about religion in America. Please read the thread.
I said that many of us were laughing that Hillary thought she could change Catholic teaching. Personally, I doubted she could change Evangelical teachings either.
No. You said we should lose sleep over it.
I didn’t investigate Mrs. Clinton’s degree of Christianity either.
You said she wanted to dismantle christianity
I didn’t investigate Mrs. Clinton’s degree of Christianity either.
Who said this?
What should cause us sleepless nights is a left wing that wants to bully and shame Christians into voting for a candidate who wants to abolish Christianity’s–especially Catholic–central teachings and tenets. If you want Christians to vote for your candidate, then perhaps next time call on him/her to support religious freedom and to respect religious teachings and beliefs. Otherwise count on Christians to vote for the adulterer who respects religious freedoms and Christian teachings
A candidate that wants to “abolish christianitys teachings and tenants”
Alright, you Christian tenants–you are hereby abolished! (Shouldn’t tenants be evicted not abolished.)
I know…you don’t understand the joke. However, it keeps me laughing. What else do you have?
I’m sorry but you seem to deny what you type A LOT
And I’m sorry you don’t understand a thing I say. Still, it’s amusing. Every good joke employs a twist. Keep 'em coming!