Why are democrats protecting child sex offenders?

Now LuLou…I don’t care who ya r…that’s funny rite there. :rofl: :tumbler_glass:

1 Like

No we don’t agree. I DO NOT think that her sentence is excessive. Like I said she got off light compared to what she was eligible for.

1 Like

Here is the answer to my thread.

They will tell you because they’re so full of love and compassion for the hapless foreign national. That’s one of their biggest lies ever. And everyone knows if. I don’t think they’re kicking, scratching and spitting on federal agents out of love.

#1. They must oppose Trump no matter what. If Trump found a cure for cancer, they would be pro cancer.
#2. It’s a power play Their base is the dependent class. Without a robust dependent class they are nothing.
#3. Districting. If they can stuff more invaders into the county, they get more congressional districts.

She directly abused many of the victims.

Wild that you are siding with this piece of garbage.

1 Like

She also physcailly abused them.

And please pull up some data on the number of victims relative to sentencing length.

Will to bet most people found guilty of abuse have had way fewer victims than this peach.

Nope. You spend most of your time defending all things Trump and Maga and GOP, regardless of your claims of not supporting Trump or MAGA or the GOP.

They will tell you because they’re so full of love and compassion for the hapless foreign national. That’s one of their biggest lies ever. And everyone knows if. I don’t think they’re kicking, scratching and spitting on federal agents out of love.

#1. They must oppose Trump no matter what. If Trump found a cure for cancer, they would be pro cancer.
#2. It’s a power play Their base is the dependent class. Without a robust dependent class they are nothing.
#3. Districting. If they can stuff more invaders into the county, they get more congressional districts.

I kinda nailed it. Right?

1 Like

Sir, this is a Wendy’s.

(IOW, are you responding to the right post?)

Dumb question. Wanna go back and read the title of MY thread? Then you may answer the question that I asked you.
:slightly_smiling_face:

I responded to Samm.

You responded to that response with a bunch of questions unrelated to our exchange.

In short, I don’t know what you are referencing.

Was this you?

I’m not siding with anyone. My post that you are so obsessed with is nothing more than opinion of the sentence she received.

And there was no evidence that she partook in sex acts with the underaged girls with Epstein, any other man, or by herself.

Cite your evidence that she sexually abused them.

I gave you my data. If you have contradictory data, post it.

Exposing your misinformed opinions and falsehoods is not defending anyone. It’s a direct criticism of your posts regardless of who or what is the focus of the conversation. Your problem is that you hate Trump so much that you see any rebuttal of your pathetic rhetoric as being pro-Trump. Anyone here who has read my posts over the last ten years knows that I am not a Republican and no fan of Trump. So, when you accuse me of being a defender of “all things Trump and Maga and GOP” all you do is accentuate your pathologically blind hatred of all things Trump. And I don’t think I’m the only one here to see that.

2 Likes

Claiming she should have gotten a lesser sentence for nonsensical reasons is siding with her.

victims statements.

I never claimed that she should have gotten a lighter sentence, I said she would have gotten a lighter sentence had Epstein gone to trial. Your TDS has you by the throat.

Cite the victim statements. Be specific.

Oh stop.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/maxwell-sex-abuse-trial-resume-with-epstein-pilots-testimony-2021-11-30/

Only when you learn to read and comprehend what I post.

Thank you.

“On other occasions, also at age 14, Jane said Maxwell and Epstein would take her to a massage table in his Palm Beach house and demonstrate how Epstein liked to be massaged. The massages transitioned into sexual activity, and Maxwell sometimes touched her breasts, Jane said.”

Without the benefit of cross examination, it sounds like the “sexual activity” was with Epstein and the touching of breasts by Maxwell was part of the instruction.

But I stand corrected. That counts as abuse.

All I seem to keep seeing in news feeds are european personalities falling like dominoes.

1 Like