i agree in certain instances.
not always however.
that is where we parts ways.
Allan
WuWei
887
Well… you’re wrong. Again.
It’s in the name.
Samm
888
Which gets us back to this …
You can’t have it both ways.
2 Likes
neither can you.
either total freedom (which includes the right to choose) or big brother spying on our personal choices.
Allan
Samm
890
I am only having it one way. More government means less freedom. Always.
2 Likes
e7alr
891
I’ll settle for a lot more Thomas Paine and no Marx.
3 Likes
yet you favor regulations against freedom to choose.
thats a huge dichotomy.
Allan
Samm
893
Not in the least. Choosing to end the life of another human being is not a freedom.
3 Likes
Samm
895
You are right … so long as one recognizes that any other persons may freely choose to kill you without hindrance or restraint as well.
1 Like
Samm
896
But if you want to talk about dichotomy, try this one on …
3 Likes
and thats were we disagree. you think very restrictive govt regulations are good on this particular issue.
they are not. either you are for less govt or you are not.
you cant have it both ways.
Allan
Samm
898
You are confusing natural laws with man’s laws.
big govt telling people what they can and cannot do.
doesnt sound like freedom to me.
Allan
Samm
900
Natural laws do not exclude government from duplicating them.
at least admit that you think some big govt regulations are good.
big brother is watching your mailbox so that you cant get abortion drugs
online.
Allan
Samm
902
Why? To make you feel better about being regulated?
some big govt regulations are good, esp if you agree with them.
right?
Allan
Samm
904
Government did not invent the law against killing people for personal reasons.
2 Likes
no they invented regulations to stop people from aborting a fetus by using drugs early in a pregnancy.
either you like regulations or you dont.
you dont get to pick and choose the ones you like.
Allan
